{"id":3344,"date":"2017-04-07T07:28:30","date_gmt":"2017-04-07T07:28:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/?p=3344"},"modified":"2024-07-16T12:03:59","modified_gmt":"2024-07-16T11:03:59","slug":"surface-water-body-typology-category-river-in-the-1st-and-2nd-cycle-of-river-basin-management-plans-and-its-consequence-to-ecological-status-assessment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/2017\/04\/surface-water-body-typology-category-river-in-the-1st-and-2nd-cycle-of-river-basin-management-plans-and-its-consequence-to-ecological-status-assessment\/","title":{"rendered":"Surface water body typology category river in the 1st and 2nd cycle of River Basin Management Plans and its consequence to ecological status assessment"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/i> This article is available in Czech only. For translation or more information on this topic, please contact author.<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

Souhrn<\/h2>\n

Vymezen\u00ed \u00fatvar\u016f povrchov\u00fdch vod a\u00a0ur\u010den\u00ed jejich typologie pat\u0159\u00ed k\u00a0prvn\u00edm krok\u016fm p\u0159i implementaci R\u00e1mcov\u00e9 sm\u011brnice o\u00a0vod\u011b (d\u00e1le RSV) [1]. Prvn\u00ed vymezen\u00ed a\u00a0ur\u010den\u00ed typ\u016f v\u00a0\u010cR prob\u011bhlo v\u00a0letech 2004 a\u00a02005 v\u00a0r\u00e1mci prvn\u00edho cyklu pl\u00e1n\u016f povod\u00ed, cel\u00fd proces v\u0161ak byl v\u00fdznamn\u011b p\u0159epracov\u00e1n v\u00a0obdob\u00ed 2009 a\u017e 2010 pro druh\u00fd cyklus. C\u00edlem \u010dl\u00e1nku je porovnat postupy stanoven\u00ed typologie v\u00a0prvn\u00edm a\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu pl\u00e1n\u016f a\u00a0uk\u00e1zat d\u016fsledky zm\u011bn, kter\u00e9 ovliv\u0148uj\u00ed i\u00a0z\u00e1kladn\u00ed nastaven\u00ed ochrany povrchov\u00fdch vod.<\/p>\n\"shutterstock_310954355_upr\"<\/a>\n

\u00davod<\/h2>\n

Ur\u010den\u00ed typ\u016f \u00fatvar\u016f povrchov\u00fdch vod je podle R\u00e1mcov\u00e9 sm\u011brnice o\u00a0vod\u011b jeden ze z\u00e1klad\u016f charakterizace oblast\u00ed povod\u00ed. Typy \u00fatvar\u016f povrchov\u00fdch vod jsou z\u00e1sadn\u00ed pro ur\u010den\u00ed dobr\u00e9ho ekologick\u00e9ho stavu, kdy kvalita, struktura a\u00a0funkce vodn\u00edch ekosyst\u00e9m\u016f spojen\u00fdch s\u00a0povrchov\u00fdmi vodami jsou sice m\u00edrn\u011b ovlivn\u011bny antropogenn\u00edmi zm\u011bnami, ale odli\u0161uj\u00ed se m\u00e1lo od nenaru\u0161en\u00fdch podm\u00ednek [2]. Nastaven\u00ed typologie p\u0159\u00edmo ur\u010duje nastaven\u00ed limit\u016f dobr\u00e9ho ekologick\u00e9ho stavu jak biologick\u00fdch slo\u017eek, tak fyzik\u00e1ln\u011b\u00ad\u2011chemick\u00e9 slo\u017eky. D\u00edky typologii mohou b\u00fdt stanoveny limity pro skupiny typ\u016f rozd\u00edln\u011b. Podle sm\u011brnice se to sice t\u00fdk\u00e1 v\u0161ech kategori\u00ed povrchov\u00fdch vod (v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b \u010cR tedy \u0159ek a\u00a0jezer), ale v\u0161echny \u010desk\u00e9 \u00fatvary kategorie jezero jsou bu\u010f siln\u011b ovlivn\u011bn\u00e9 (co\u017e znamen\u00e1, \u017ee p\u016fvodn\u011b pat\u0159ily k\u00a0\u0159ek\u00e1m, ale na z\u00e1klad\u011b vznikl\u00fdch hydromorfologick\u00fdch modifikac\u00ed se z\u00a0nich staly n\u00e1dr\u017ee \u010di rybn\u00edky), nebo um\u011bl\u00e9 (v\u011bt\u0161inou zatopen\u00e9 vyt\u011b\u017een\u00e9 prostory na m\u00edstech, kde se p\u0159edt\u00edm \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd vodn\u00ed \u00fatvar nevyskytoval). Pro tyto \u00fatvary se stanov\u00ed limity dobr\u00e9ho potenci\u00e1lu, kter\u00e9 ale v\u00edce ne\u017e na stanoven\u00e9m typu z\u00e1vis\u00ed na zp\u016fsobu u\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed [3]. Z\u00a0toho d\u016fvodu je typologie v\u00a0\u010desk\u00fdch podm\u00ednk\u00e1ch z\u00e1sadn\u00ed pouze pro \u201ep\u0159irozen\u00e9\u201c \u0159eky.<\/p>\n\"Prchalova-1\"<\/a>\n

Obr.\u00a01. Po\u010det vymezen\u00fdch \u00fatvar\u016f kategorie \u0159eka v\u00a0prvn\u00edm cyklu pl\u00e1n\u016f, p\u0159epo\u010dten\u00fd na plochu \u010cR (NL\u00a0\u2013 Holandsko, SI\u00a0\u2013 Slovinsko, HU\u00a0\u2013 Ma\u010farsko, CZ\u00a0\u2013 \u010cesk\u00e1 republika, RO\u00a0\u2013 Rumunsko, PL\u00a0\u2013 Polsko, FR\u00a0\u2013 Francie, DE\u00a0\u2013 N\u011bmecko, UK\u00a0\u2013 Velk\u00e1 Brit\u00e1nie, SK\u00a0\u2013 Slovensk\u00e1 republika, AT\u00a0\u2013 Rakousko, IE\u00a0\u2013 Irsko); zdroj dat: Eionet Central Data Repository
\nFig. 1. Number of delineated surface water bodies category river in the 1st<\/sup> cycle of plans, recalculated to the area of CZ (NL\u00a0\u2013 Netherlands, SI\u00a0\u2013 United Kingdom, SK\u00a0\u2013 Slovakia, AT\u00a0\u2013 Austria, IE\u00a0\u2013 Ireland); data source: Eionet Central Data Repository<\/h6>\n

S\u00a0typologi\u00ed souvis\u00ed tak\u00e9 vlastn\u00ed vymezen\u00ed \u00fatvar\u016f povrchov\u00fdch vod\u00a0\u2013 ide\u00e1ln\u00ed situace je takov\u00e1, kdy v\u0161echny \u00fatvary jsou z\u00a0hlediska typologie homogenn\u00ed. Z\u00e1rove\u0148 ale nen\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9 zvy\u0161ovat ne\u00fam\u011brn\u011b po\u010det vymezen\u00fdch \u00fatvar\u016f, nebo\u0165 pro ka\u017ed\u00fd \u00fatvar je pot\u0159eba hodnotit jeho ekologick\u00fd a\u00a0chemick\u00fd stav \u010di potenci\u00e1l, co\u017e znamen\u00e1 mimo jin\u00e9 zna\u010dn\u00e9 po\u017eadavky na monitoring. Ji\u017e v\u00a0prvn\u00edm cyklu pl\u00e1n\u016f, p\u0159ipravovan\u00fdch do konce roku 2009, se p\u0159\u00edstupy \u010dlensk\u00fdch st\u00e1t\u016f v\u00fdznamn\u011b li\u0161ily, nap\u0159.\u00a0Holandsko a\u00a0Slovinsko vymezilo pom\u011brn\u011b mal\u00fd po\u010det\u00a0vodn\u00edch \u00fatvar\u016f\/\u0159ek (p\u0159i p\u0159epo\u010dtu na plochu \u010cR kolem 500), naopak Rakousko m\u00e1 kolem 7\u2009000 a\u00a0Irsko dokonce 13\u2009000 \u00fatvar\u016f kategorie \u0159eka (obr.\u00a01<\/em>) [4]. Z\u00a0tohoto hlediska se v\u00a0\u010cR jak p\u016fvodn\u00ed po\u010det 1\u2009028 \u00fatvar\u016f kategorie \u0159eka, tak sou\u010dasn\u00fd po\u010det 1\u2009044 \u00fatvar\u016f zd\u00e1 jako celkem adekv\u00e1tn\u00ed, nicm\u00e9n\u011b bude nutn\u00e9 po\u010d\u00edtat s\u00a0ur\u010ditou m\u00edrou nehomogenity mezi \u010dlensk\u00fdmi st\u00e1ty.<\/p>\n

Tabulka 1. Typologie podle syst\u00e9mu A; zdroj dat: R\u00e1mcov\u00e1 sm\u011brnice o\u00a0vod\u011b
\nTable 1. Typology under system A; data source: Water Framework Directive<\/h5>\n\"Prchalova-tabulka1\"<\/a>\n

Typologie v\u00a0prvn\u00edm a\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu pl\u00e1n\u016f<\/h2>\n

Vymezen\u00ed vodn\u00edch \u00fatvar\u016f a\u00a0stanoven\u00ed jejich typ\u016f pat\u0159\u00ed hned k\u00a0prvn\u00edm \u010dinnostem p\u0159i p\u0159\u00edprav\u011b pl\u00e1n\u016f povod\u00ed. Prvn\u00ed vymezen\u00ed \u00fatvar\u016f kategorie \u0159eka a\u00a0jejich typologie [5] tak prob\u011bhlo do roku 2004 (spole\u010dn\u011b s\u00a0charakterizac\u00ed a\u00a0anal\u00fdzou vliv\u016f a\u00a0dopad\u016f).<\/p>\n

Tabulka 2. Typologie \u0159ek v\u00a0prvn\u00edm pl\u00e1nu; zdroj dat: Charakterizace oblast\u00ed povod\u00ed (Zpr\u00e1va 2005)
\nTable 2. River typology in the 1st<\/sup> plan; data source: River Basin District Characterisation (Report 2005)<\/h5>\n\"Prchalova-tabulka2\"<\/a>\n

R\u00e1mcov\u00e1 sm\u011brnice o\u00a0vod\u011b po\u017eaduje, aby p\u0159i typologii byl pou\u017eit bu\u010f syst\u00e9m A\u00a0(viz\u00a0n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed odstavec), kter\u00fd z\u00e1rove\u0148 zahrnuje po\u017eadavek na minim\u00e1ln\u00ed stupe\u0148 rozli\u0161en\u00ed, nebo je mo\u017en\u00e9 pou\u017e\u00edt alternativn\u00ed syst\u00e9m B (obsahuj\u00edc\u00ed n\u011bkter\u00e9 z\u00e1vazn\u00e9 a\u00a0dal\u0161\u00ed voliteln\u00e9 faktory podle \u010dlensk\u00fdch st\u00e1t\u016f). I\u00a0v\u00a0takov\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b by podle RSV \u010dlensk\u00e9 st\u00e1ty m\u011bly p\u0159edlo\u017eit mapu s\u00a0geografick\u00fdmi polohami typ\u016f shodn\u00fdch se stupn\u011bm rozli\u0161en\u00ed v\u00a0syst\u00e9mu A. Prvn\u00ed typologie byla zalo\u017eena na syst\u00e9mu A\u00a0s\u00a0p\u0159id\u00e1n\u00edm dal\u0161\u00ed charakteristiky, tak\u017ee ve v\u00fdsledku to byla kombinace syst\u00e9mu A\u00a0a\u00a0B.<\/p>\n\"Prchalova-2\"<\/a>\n

Obr.\u00a02. Ekoregiony v\u00a0\u010cR; zdroj dat: Charakterizace oblast\u00ed povod\u00ed (Zpr\u00e1va 2005)
\nFig. 2. Ecoregions in CR; data source: River Basin District Characterisation (Report 2005)<\/h6>\n

Syst\u00e9m A\u00a0pova\u017euje za z\u00e1kladn\u00ed charakteristiku ekoregiony (rozlo\u017een\u00ed ekoregion\u016f v\u00a0\u010cesk\u00e9 republice je na obr.\u00a02<\/em>), d\u00e1le nadmo\u0159skou v\u00fd\u0161ku, velikost povod\u00ed a\u00a0geologick\u00fd typ (tabulka 1<\/em>). V\u00a0prvn\u00ed typologii byla vzhledem k\u00a0poloze \u010cR kategorie nadmo\u0159sk\u00e9 v\u00fd\u0161ky zjemn\u011bna (byla p\u0159id\u00e1na nadmo\u0159sk\u00e1 v\u00fd\u0161ka 500\u00a0m\u00a0n.\u00a0m.), v\u00a0geologii byl na z\u00e1klad\u011b v\u00fdsledk\u016f silik\u00e1tov\u00e9 anal\u00fdzy rozli\u0161en v\u00e1pnit\u00fd a\u00a0k\u0159emit\u00fd typ (organick\u00fd typ se v\u00a0\u010cR prakticky nevyskytuje), plocha povod\u00ed byla p\u0159evzata bez \u00faprav a\u00a0jako dodate\u010dn\u00e1 charakteristika byl pou\u017eit \u0159\u00e1d toku podle Strahlera. V\u00fdsledn\u00fd typ byl tedy slo\u017een z\u00a0n\u011bkolika k\u00f3d\u016f (tabulka 2<\/em>). T\u00edmto zp\u016fsobem bylo v\u00a0\u010cR vymezeno celkem 87 typ\u016f \u00fatvar\u016f kategorie \u0159eka [6].<\/p>\n

V\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu pl\u00e1n\u016f bylo rozhodnuto, \u017ee mus\u00ed b\u00fdt nov\u011b zpracov\u00e1na cel\u00e1 typologie a\u00a0\u017ee podle n\u00ed budou nov\u011b p\u0159evymezeny \u00fatvary povrchov\u00fdch vod.<\/p>\n\"Prchalova-3-a-4\"<\/a>\n

Obr.\u00a03. a\u00a04. Pod\u00edl \u00fatvar\u016f kategorie \u0159eka podle nadmo\u0159sk\u00e9 v\u00fd\u0161ky\u00a0\u2013 p\u016fvodn\u00ed typologie (vlevo) a\u00a0typologie v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu (vpravo); zdroj dat: Charakterizace oblast\u00ed povod\u00ed (Zpr\u00e1va 2005) a\u00a0Reporting povod\u00ed 2016
\nFig. 3. and 4. Proportion of river water bodies based on altitude typology\u00a0\u2013 the 1st<\/sup> plan (left panel) and altitude typology\u00a0\u2013 the 2nd<\/sup> plan (right panel); data source: River Basin District Characterisation (Report 2005) and River Basin Management Plans Reporting 2016<\/h6>\n

Nov\u00e1 typologie [2] tak\u00e9 vy\u0161la ze syst\u00e9mu A, ale jednak m\u00edsto ekoregion\u016f pou\u017eila \u00famo\u0159\u00ed, nadmo\u0159sk\u00e1 v\u00fd\u0161ka byla pou\u017eita beze zm\u011bny a\u00a0velikost povod\u00ed byla vypu\u0161t\u011bna. Faktory geologie a\u00a0\u0159\u00e1du toku sice z\u016fstaly, jejich aplikace v\u0161ak byla zna\u010dn\u011b jin\u00e1\u00a0\u2013 v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b geologie bylo konstatov\u00e1no, \u017ee d\u011blen\u00ed geologie podle syst\u00e9mu A\u00a0je v\u00a0\u010cR nepou\u017eiteln\u00e9, vzhledem k\u00a0neexistenci organick\u00e9ho typu a\u00a0zanedbateln\u00e9mu rozsahu karbon\u00e1t\u016f, tud\u00ed\u017e bylo doporu\u010deno pou\u017e\u00edt m\u00edsto litologick\u00e9ho hlediska strukturn\u00ed d\u011blen\u00ed (typ metamorfity a\u00a0vyv\u0159eliny a\u00a0druh\u00fd sedimenty a\u00a0kvart\u00e9r). Ve v\u00fdsledku v\u0161ak byl pou\u017eit typ krystalinikum a\u00a0vulkanity a\u00a0jako druh\u00fd p\u00edskovce, j\u00edlovce a\u00a0kvart\u00e9r.<\/p>\n\"Prchalova-5-a-6\"<\/a>\n

Obr.\u00a05. a\u00a06. Pod\u00edl \u00fatvar\u016f kategorie \u0159eka podle geologie\u00a0\u2013 p\u016fvodn\u00ed typologie (vlevo) a\u00a0typologie v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu (vpravo); zdroj dat: Charakterizace oblast\u00ed povod\u00ed (Zpr\u00e1va 2005) a\u00a0Reporting povod\u00ed 2016
\nFig. 5. and 6. Proportion of river water bodies based on geology\u00a0\u2013 the 1st<\/sup> plan (left panel) and typology\u00a0\u2013 the 2nd<\/sup> plan (right panel); data source: River Basin District Characterisation (Report 2005) and River Basin Management Plans Reporting 2016<\/h6>\n

Stejn\u011b tak bylo p\u0159ed\u011bl\u00e1no i\u00a0rozd\u011blen\u00ed typ\u016f podle \u0159\u00e1du toku (Strahlera) jednak byly \u0159\u00e1dy znovu p\u0159epo\u010dteny podle mapy 1 : 10\u2009000 (d\u0159\u00edv\u011bj\u0161\u00ed rozli\u0161en\u00ed bylo na podkladu mapy 1 : 50\u2009000), \u010d\u00edm\u017e bylo v\u00a0\u0159\u00e1dech dosa\u017eeno hodnoty 9 (p\u016fvodn\u011b byly nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00ed toky \u0159\u00e1du 8, nejmen\u0161\u00ed za\u010d\u00ednaly \u0159\u00e1dem 4), a\u00a0toky byly rozd\u011bleny do t\u0159\u00ed kategori\u00ed\u00a0\u2013 \u0159\u00e1d 1\u20133, 4\u20136 a\u00a07\u20139.<\/p>\n

Po\u010det deskriptor\u016f typologie se tedy ve v\u00fdsledku v\u00fdrazn\u011b sn\u00ed\u017eil a\u00a0p\u0159i aplikaci vzniklo pouze 35 typ\u016f (proti p\u016fvodn\u00edm 87).<\/p>\n

Porovn\u00e1n\u00ed v\u00fdsledk\u016f typologie v\u00a0prvn\u00edm a\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu<\/h2>\n

Porovn\u00e1n\u00ed v\u00fdsledk\u016f typologie mezi prvn\u00edm a\u00a0druh\u00fdm cyklem je mo\u017en\u00e9 ud\u011blat pouze omezen\u011b, nebo\u0165 z\u00e1rove\u0148 se zm\u011bnou typologie bylo v\u00fdznamn\u011b p\u0159evymezeno cca\u00a030\u00a0% \u00fatvar\u016f povrchov\u00fdch vod.<\/p>\n

Volba \u00famo\u0159\u00ed, kter\u00e1 jsou toto\u017en\u00e1 s\u00a0rozli\u0161en\u00edm n\u00e1rodn\u00edch oblast\u00ed povod\u00ed, m\u00edsto ekoregion\u016f znamenala zna\u010dnou zm\u011bnu v\u00a0typologii. Jak je na obr.\u00a02<\/em> z\u0159ejm\u00e9, podobnost mezi \u00famo\u0159\u00edm a\u00a0ekoregiony je omezen\u00e1. Zat\u00edmco Centr\u00e1ln\u00ed vyso\u010dina je jedin\u00fd ekoregion v\u00a0oblasti povod\u00ed Labe, ale zasahuje i\u00a0do zbyl\u00fdch dvou \u00famo\u0159\u00ed, tak n\u00e1rodn\u00ed \u010d\u00e1sti povod\u00ed Dunaje i\u00a0Odry jsou p\u0159i pou\u017eit\u00ed ekoregion\u016f podrobn\u011bji rozd\u011blen\u00e9.<\/p>\n\"Prchalova-7-a-8\"<\/a>\n

Obr.\u00a07. a\u00a08. Pod\u00edl \u00fatvar\u016f kategorie \u0159eka podle \u0159\u00e1du toku \u2013 p\u016fvodn\u00ed typologie (vlevo) a\u00a0typologie v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu (vpravo); zdroj dat: Charakterizace oblast\u00ed povod\u00ed (Zpr\u00e1va 2005) a\u00a0Reporting povod\u00ed 2016
\nFig. 7. and 8. Proportion of river water bodies based on Strahler orded\u00a0\u2013 the 1st<\/sup> plan (left panel) and typology\u00a0\u2013 the 2nd<\/sup> plan (right panel); data source: River Basin District Characterisation (Report 2005) and River Basin Management Plans Reporting 2016<\/h6>\n

Nadmo\u0159sk\u00e1 v\u00fd\u0161ka byla pou\u017eita stejn\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem a\u00a0i\u00a0p\u0159es zm\u011bny ve vymezen\u00ed \u00fatvar\u016f povrchov\u00fdch vod je pod\u00edl \u00fatvar\u016f v\u00a0jednotliv\u00fdch nadmo\u0159sk\u00fdch v\u00fd\u0161k\u00e1ch t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 toto\u017en\u00fd (obr.\u00a03<\/em> a\u00a04<\/em>).<\/p>\n

Naproti tomu p\u0159i\u0159azen\u00ed geologick\u00e9 charakteristiky vykazuje u\u017e zna\u010dn\u00e9 rozd\u00edly (obr.\u00a05<\/em> a\u00a06<\/em>), co\u017e je d\u00e1no hlavn\u011b jin\u00fdm pojet\u00edm geologick\u00fdch typ\u016f. Zat\u00edmco pod\u00edl k\u0159emit\u00fdch typ\u016f je v\u00fdznamn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed, v\u00a0druh\u00e9 typologii m\u00edrn\u011b p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00ed p\u00edskovce, j\u00edlovce a\u00a0kvart\u00e9r (co\u017e ale neodpov\u00edd\u00e1 geologick\u00fdm pom\u011br\u016fm v\u00a0\u010cR).<\/p>\n

Nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00ed rozd\u00edl v\u0161ak vznikl seskupen\u00edm \u0159\u00e1d\u016f tok\u016f do t\u0159\u00ed kategori\u00ed v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu proti p\u016fvodn\u00edm p\u011bti kategori\u00edm (obr.\u00a07<\/em> a\u00a08<\/em>). Nov\u011b byla za\u0159azena kategorie tok\u016f ni\u017e\u0161\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du (1\u20133), zat\u00edmco v\u00a0p\u016fvodn\u00ed typologii za\u010d\u00ednaly \u00fatvary a\u017e od \u0159\u00e1du\u00a04. Z\u00e1sadn\u00ed rozd\u00edl proti p\u016fvodn\u00ed typologii podle \u0159\u00e1du tok\u016f je, \u017ee drtiv\u00e1 v\u011bt\u0161ina tok\u016f \u010cR byla v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu p\u0159i\u0159azena k\u00a0jedin\u00e9 kategorii.<\/p>\n\"Prchalova-9-a-10\"<\/a>\n

Obr.\u00a09. a\u00a010. Pod\u00edl nej\u010dast\u011bji se vyskytuj\u00edc\u00edch typ\u016f \u00fatvar\u016f kategorie \u0159eka podle p\u016fvodn\u00ed typologie (vlevo) a\u00a0typologie v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu (vpravo); zdroj dat: Charakterizace oblast\u00ed povod\u00ed (Zpr\u00e1va 2005) a\u00a0Reporting povod\u00ed 2016
\nFig. 9. and 10. Proportion of most frequent river water body types\u00a0\u2013 the 1st<\/sup> plan (left panel) and the 2nd<\/sup> plan (right panel); data source: River Basin District Characterisation (Report 2005) and River Basin Management Plans Reporting 2016<\/h6>\n

Ve v\u00fdsledku v\u00a0prvn\u00edm cyklu p\u011bt nej\u010detn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch typ\u016f tvo\u0159ilo cca\u00a060\u00a0% v\u0161ech \u00fatvar\u016f, zat\u00edmco v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu \u010dty\u0159i nej\u010dast\u011bj\u0161\u00ed typy tvo\u0159\u00ed 82\u201387\u00a0% (obr.\u00a09<\/em> a\u00a010<\/em>), \u00famo\u0159\u00ed zde nen\u00ed zapo\u010d\u00edt\u00e1no, nebo\u0165 s\u00a0v\u00fdjimkou ryb nebylo pou\u017eito pro rozli\u0161en\u00ed stavu slo\u017eek ekologick\u00e9ho stavu. V\u00a0prvn\u00edm cyklu byly 3 z\u00a05 nej\u010dast\u011bj\u0161\u00edch typ\u016f za\u0159azeny do Centr\u00e1ln\u00ed vrchoviny, k\u0159emit\u00e9ho typu, nadmo\u0159sk\u00e1 v\u00fd\u0161ka 200\u2013500\u2008m a\u00a0\u0159\u00e1d Strahlera 4 nebo 5, dal\u0161\u00ed typ se li\u0161il pouze nadmo\u0159skou v\u00fd\u0161kou 500\u2013800 a\u00a0posledn\u00ed typ (zn\u00e1zorn\u011bn\u00fd \u010derven\u011b) odpov\u00edd\u00e1 ekoregionu Karpaty, nadmo\u0159sk\u00e1 v\u00fd\u0161ka 200\u2013500\u2008m, \u0159\u00e1d toku 4 a\u00a0v\u00e1pnit\u00fd typ. V\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu v\u0161echny \u010dty\u0159i nej\u010dast\u011bj\u0161\u00ed typy pat\u0159\u00ed do \u0159\u00e1du toku 4\u20136, dva pat\u0159\u00ed do krystalinika a\u00a0vulkanit\u016f, zbyl\u00e9 dva do p\u00edskovc\u016f, j\u00edlovc\u016f a\u00a0kvart\u00e9ru a\u00a0z\u00a0hlediska nadmo\u0159sk\u00e9 v\u00fd\u0161ky pat\u0159\u00ed jeden typ do nadmo\u0159sk\u00e9 v\u00fd\u0161ky m\u00e9n\u011b ne\u017e 200\u2008m, dva 200\u2013500\u2008m a\u00a0jeden 500\u2013800\u00a0m\u00a0n.\u00a0m. Z\u00a0grafu je ale z\u0159ejm\u00e9, \u017ee typy 200\u2013500\u00a0m\u00a0n.\u00a0m. (\u017elut\u00e1 a\u00a0zelen\u00e1 barva) v\u00fdrazn\u011b v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu dominuj\u00ed\u00a0\u2013 celkem tvo\u0159\u00ed 67\u00a0% v\u0161ech \u00fatvar\u016f; v\u00a0prvn\u00edm cyklu dominuje jen jeden typ (\u017elut\u00fd), pat\u0159\u00edc\u00ed do Centr\u00e1ln\u00ed vyso\u010diny, nadmo\u0159sk\u00e9 v\u00fd\u0161ky 200\u2013500\u00a0m\u00a0n.\u00a0m., ten ale tvo\u0159\u00ed pouze 18\u00a0% v\u0161ech \u00fatvar\u016f na Od\u0159e a\u00a0nejv\u00edce 33\u00a0% na Labi.<\/p>\n\"Prchalova-11-a-12\"<\/a>\n

Obr.\u00a011. a\u00a012. Pod\u00edl skupin \u00fatvar\u016f kategorie \u0159eka se stejn\u00fdm limitem N\u00ad\u2011NO3<\/sub> podle p\u016fvodn\u00ed typologie (vlevo) a\u00a0typologie v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu (vpravo); zdroj dat: Eionet Central Data Repository a\u00a0Reporting povod\u00ed 2016
\nFig. 11. and 12. Proportion of groups of river water bodies with the same limit of N\u00ad\u2011NO3<\/sub>\u00a0\u2013 the 1st<\/sup> plan (left panel) and the 2nd<\/sup> plan (right panel); data source: Eionet Central Data Repository and River Basin Management Plans Reporting 2016<\/h6>\n

D\u016fsledky nastaven\u00ed typologie v\u00a0prvn\u00edm a\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu pro hodnocen\u00ed stavu<\/h2>\n

Jak ji\u017e bylo zm\u00edn\u011bno, nastaven\u00ed typologie je z\u00e1sadn\u00ed pro stanoven\u00ed hranic velmi dobr\u00e9ho a\u00a0dobr\u00e9ho stavu, a\u00a0to pomoc\u00ed definice referen\u010dn\u00edch podm\u00ednek. Pou\u017eit\u00e1 typologie mus\u00ed b\u00fdt vhodn\u00e1 jak pro v\u0161echny relevantn\u00ed biologick\u00e9 slo\u017eky, tak pro v\u0161eobecn\u00e9 fyzik\u00e1ln\u011b\u00ad\u2011chemick\u00e9 ukazatele. Vlastn\u00ed stanoven\u00ed typologie je abiotick\u00e9, zalo\u017een\u00e9 na expertn\u00edch odhadech, proto je d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9 typologii ov\u011b\u0159it na biologick\u00fdch slo\u017ek\u00e1ch.<\/p>\n

Typologie pro \u0159eky z\u00a0prvn\u00edho cyklu byla ov\u011b\u0159ena anal\u00fdzou spole\u010denstev makrozoobentosu. Byl vyhodnocen soubor dostate\u010dn\u011b podrobn\u00fdch dat reprezentuj\u00edc\u00edch 137 vodn\u00edch \u00fatvar\u016f za\u0159azen\u00fdch do 43 typ\u016f (z\u00a087 stanoven\u00fdch), kter\u00e9 pokr\u00fdvaj\u00ed 85\u00a0% \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR. Typologie byla i\u00a0po biologick\u00e9m ov\u011b\u0159en\u00ed shled\u00e1na vyhovuj\u00edc\u00ed s\u00a0t\u00edm, \u017ee p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161nost k\u00a0povod\u00ed je v\u00fdznamn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161nost k\u00a0ekoregionu. Z\u00e1rove\u0148 v\u0161ak bylo z\u0159ejm\u00e9, \u017ee nen\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9 ani praktick\u00e9 hledat typov\u011b specifick\u00e9 referen\u010dn\u00ed podm\u00ednky pro v\u0161echny typy \u00fatvar\u016f povrchov\u00fdch vod, proto se jako dal\u0161\u00ed krok n\u011bkter\u00e9 vz\u00e1cn\u00e9 typy sdru\u017eily do skupin p\u0159\u00edbuzn\u00fdch typ\u016f,\u00a0co\u017e ve v\u00fdsledku znamenalo celkem 39 typ\u016f. Naopak byly tak\u00e9 napl\u00e1nov\u00e1ny nejfrekventovan\u011bj\u0161\u00ed typy 42114, 42124 a\u00a042125 (\u017elut\u00e9, zelen\u00e9 a\u00a0modr\u00e9 \u00fatvary kategorie \u0159eka na obr.\u00a09<\/em>), kter\u00e9 v\u00a0\u010cR tvo\u0159ily 45\u00a0% v\u0161ech \u00fatvar\u016f a\u00a0na Labi 55\u00a0% \u00fatvar\u016f, k\u00a0rozd\u011blen\u00ed v\u0161ak u\u017e nedo\u0161lo. V\u00a0r\u00e1mci reportingu prvn\u00edch pl\u00e1n\u016f bylo pak vyk\u00e1z\u00e1no p\u016fvodn\u00edch 87 typ\u016f.<\/p>\n\"Prchalova-13-a-14\"<\/a>\n

Obr.\u00a013. a\u00a014. Pod\u00edl skupin \u00fatvar\u016f kategorie \u0159eka se stejn\u00fdm limitem celkov\u00e9ho fosforu podle p\u016fvodn\u00ed typologie (vlevo) a\u00a0typologie v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu (vpravo); zdroj dat: Eionet Central Data Repository a\u00a0Reporting povod\u00ed 2016
\nFig. 13. and 14. Proportion of groups of river water bodies with the same limit of Total Phosphorus\u00a0\u2013 the 1st<\/sup> plan (left panel) and the 2nd<\/sup> plan (right panel); data source: Eionet Central Data Repository and River Basin Management Plans Reporting 2016<\/h6>\n

Nov\u011b vytvo\u0159en\u00e1 typologie v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu v\u00a0souladu s\u00a0v\u00fdsledky v\u00a0prvn\u00edch pl\u00e1nech pou\u017eila \u00famo\u0159\u00ed m\u00edsto ekoregion\u016f, z\u00e1rove\u0148 v\u0161ak sn\u00ed\u017een\u00edm po\u010dtu deskriptor\u016f a\u00a0kategori\u00ed do\u0161lo k\u00a0tomu, \u017ee nej\u010dast\u011bji se vyskytuj\u00edc\u00ed \u010dty\u0159i typy \u00fatvar\u016f tvo\u0159\u00ed kolem 80\u00a0% v\u0161ech \u00fatvar\u016f. Typologie byla testov\u00e1na na ryb\u00e1ch, kdy se v\u0161ak nepotvrdila v\u00fdznamnost geologie [7].<\/p>\n

Tabulka 3. Hodnoty limitu dobr\u00e9ho stavu podle typu \u00fatvaru pou\u017eit\u00e9 v\u00a0prvn\u00edm cyklu
\nTable 3. Values of good ecological status boundary for groups of water bodies\u00a0\u2013 the 1st<\/sup> cycle<\/h5>\n\"Prchalova-tabulka3\"<\/a>\n

V\u00a0prvn\u00edm cyklu nebyly k\u00a0dispozici ov\u011b\u0159en\u00e9 metodiky hodnocen\u00ed biologick\u00fdch slo\u017eek ani dostatek dat monitoringu, proto nelze pou\u017eit\u00ed typologie pro biologick\u00e9 slo\u017eky hodnotit. Typologie byla vyu\u017eita pouze pro typov\u011b specifick\u00e9 podm\u00ednky v\u0161eobecn\u00fdch fyzik\u00e1ln\u011b\u00ad\u2011chemick\u00fdch ukazatel\u016f. P\u0159i zpracov\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0metodik hodnocen\u00ed jednotliv\u00fdch slo\u017eek ekologick\u00e9ho stavu byla nov\u011b navr\u017een\u00e1 typologie vyu\u017eita r\u016fzn\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem\u00a0\u2013 v\u00a0z\u00e1sad\u011b v\u0161ak pro biologick\u00e9 slo\u017eky byly vyu\u017eity jen n\u011bkter\u00e9 prvky typologie. Tak nap\u0159.\u00a0pro makrozoobentos a\u00a0makrofyta byly pro rozli\u0161en\u00ed stavu pou\u017eity pouze nadmo\u0159sk\u00e1 v\u00fd\u0161ka a\u00a0\u0159\u00e1d toku [8, 9], pro ryby \u00famo\u0159\u00ed, nadmo\u0159sk\u00e1 v\u00fd\u0161ka a\u00a0\u0159\u00e1d toku [6] a\u00a0pro fytoplankton jen \u0159\u00e1d toku\u00a0[10]. Naopak v\u0161ak bylo pot\u0159eba n\u011bkter\u00e9 charakteristiky rozd\u011blit detailn\u011bji\u00a0\u2013 to se t\u00fdkalo hlavn\u011b fytobentosu [11], kde byly vyu\u017eity z\u00a0typologie pouze nadmo\u0159sk\u00e1 v\u00fd\u0161ka a\u00a0\u0159\u00e1d toku, ale s\u00a0mnohem vy\u0161\u0161\u00edm po\u010dtem kategori\u00ed, pop\u0159.\u00a0byly p\u0159id\u00e1ny dal\u0161\u00ed charakteristiky (nap\u0159.\u00a0pro makrozoobentos).<\/p>\n

Tabulka 4. Hodnoty limitu dobr\u00e9ho stavu podle typu \u00fatvaru pou\u017eit\u00e9 v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu
\nTable 4. Values of good ecological status boundary for groups of water bodies\u00a0\u2013 the 2nd <\/sup>cycle<\/h5>\n\"Prchalova-tabulka4\"<\/a>\n

\u00damo\u0159\u00ed tedy bylo nakonec vyu\u017eito pouze pro ryby, geologie pouze pro v\u0161eobecn\u00e9 fyzik\u00e1ln\u011b\u00ad\u2011chemick\u00e9 ukazatele [12]. Porovn\u00e1n\u00ed d\u016fsledk\u016f nastaven\u00ed typologie v\u00a0prvn\u00edm a\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu bylo mo\u017en\u00e9 jen pro fyzik\u00e1ln\u011b\u00ad\u2011chemick\u00e9 ukazatele ekologick\u00e9ho stavu. Jak ji\u017e bylo zm\u00edn\u011bno, typov\u011b specifick\u00e9 podm\u00ednky umo\u017e\u0148uj\u00ed stanovit limity dobr\u00e9ho stavu pro skupiny typ\u016f rozd\u00edln\u011b, co\u017e bylo pou\u017eito jak v\u00a0prvn\u00edm, tak v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu pl\u00e1n\u016f.<\/p>\n

Anal\u00fdza nastaven\u00ed limit\u016f podle typ\u016f byla provedena pro \u010dty\u0159i ukazatele, kter\u00e9 byly obdobn\u011b nebo stejn\u011b pou\u017eity v\u00a0obou cyklech a\u00a0kter\u00e9 v\u00fdrazn\u011b ovlivnily v\u00fdsledek ekologick\u00e9ho stavu\u00a0\u2013 dusi\u010dnanov\u00fd dus\u00edk, celkov\u00fd fosfor, rozpu\u0161t\u011bn\u00fd kysl\u00edk a\u00a0biochemick\u00e1 spot\u0159eba kysl\u00edku. P\u0159ehled limit\u016f dobr\u00e9ho stavu a\u00a0charakteristick\u00fdch hodnot v\u00a0prvn\u00edm a\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu je uveden v\u00a0tabulce 3<\/em> a\u00a04<\/em>.<\/p>\n\"Prchalova-15-a-16\"<\/a>\n

Obr.\u00a015. a\u00a016. Pod\u00edl skupin \u00fatvar\u016f kategorie \u0159eka se stejn\u00fdm limitem rozpu\u0161t\u011bn\u00e9ho kysl\u00edku podle p\u016fvodn\u00ed typologie (vlevo) a\u00a0typologie v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu (vpravo); zdroj dat: Eionet Central Data Repository a\u00a0Reporting povod\u00ed 2016
\nFig. 15. and 16. Proportion of groups of river water bodies with the same limit of Dissolved Oxygen\u00a0\u2013 the 1st<\/sup> plan (left panel) and the 2nd<\/sup> plan (right panel); data source: Eionet Central Data Repository and River Basin Management Plans Reporting 2016<\/h6>\n

Z\u00a0porovn\u00e1n\u00ed obou tabulek vypl\u00fdv\u00e1, \u017ee pro dusi\u010dnanov\u00fd dus\u00edk byla sice zm\u011bn\u011bna charakteristick\u00e1 hodnota z\u00a0maxima na medi\u00e1n, ale z\u00e1rove\u0148 st\u0159edn\u00ed hodnota byla zp\u0159\u00edsn\u011bna, pro celkov\u00fd fosfor do\u0161lo k\u00a0v\u00fdrazn\u00e9mu zp\u0159\u00edsn\u011bn\u00ed, naopak pro rozpu\u0161t\u011bn\u00fd kysl\u00edk k\u00a0v\u00fdrazn\u00e9mu zm\u011bk\u010den\u00ed a\u00a0hodnocen\u00ed BSK5<\/sub> z\u016fstalo stejn\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Pokud ov\u0161em k\u00a0limit\u016fm pou\u017eijeme i\u00a0faktor typologie, kter\u00fd zm\u011bnil skupiny \u00fatvar\u016f, pro kter\u00e9 byl pou\u017eit r\u016fzn\u011b p\u0159\u00edsn\u00fd limit, celkov\u00fd obraz se v\u00fdrazn\u011b zm\u011bn\u00ed. Pod\u00edl \u00fatvar\u016f s\u00a0nejm\u00e9n\u011b p\u0159\u00edsn\u00fdm limitem se pro dusi\u010dnanov\u00fd dus\u00edk v\u00fdrazn\u011b zv\u00fd\u0161il (obr.\u00a011<\/em> a\u00a012<\/em>), tud\u00ed\u017e celkov\u00e9 hodnocen\u00ed je mnohem m\u00edrn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed (i\u00a0bez zohledn\u011bn\u00ed zm\u011bny charakteristick\u00e9 hodnoty). Obdobn\u011b, i\u00a0kdy\u017e pro celkov\u00fd fosfor byly stanoveny t\u0159i p\u0159\u00edsn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed limity ne\u017e v\u00a0prvn\u00edm cyklu, po\u010det \u00fatvar\u016f, na kter\u00fd se vztahovaly, byl natolik n\u00edzk\u00fd (nap\u0159.\u00a0nejp\u0159\u00edsn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed limit platil jen pro 4 \u00fatvary z\u00a01\u2009044), \u017ee ve v\u00fdsledku bylo zp\u0159\u00edsn\u011bn\u00ed minim\u00e1ln\u00ed (obr.\u00a013<\/em> a\u00a014<\/em>). Zm\u011bk\u010den\u00ed se potvrzuje pouze u\u00a0rozpu\u0161t\u011bn\u00e9ho kysl\u00edku, i\u00a0kdy\u017e ne tak v\u00fdrazn\u011b, jak by se mohlo zd\u00e1t pouze z\u00a0porovn\u00e1n\u00ed limit\u016f (obr.\u00a015<\/em> a\u00a016<\/em>). U\u00a0biochemick\u00e9 spot\u0159eby kysl\u00edku sice z\u016fstaly limity stejn\u00e9, ale pod\u00edl \u00fatvar\u016f s\u00a0nejp\u0159\u00edsn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed hodnotou klesl z\u00a080\u00a0% na 13\u00a0% pro \u010cR (obr.\u00a017<\/em> a\u00a018<\/em>).<\/p>\n

Z\u00e1v\u011bry a\u00a0diskuse<\/h2>\n

Z\u00a0v\u00fdsledk\u016f se ukazuje, \u017ee nastaven\u00ed typologie dok\u00e1\u017ee ovlivnit c\u00edle ochrany vod stejn\u011b v\u00fdrazn\u011b jako nastaven\u00ed hranice dobr\u00e9ho ekologick\u00e9ho stavu. Pokud je p\u0159evl\u00e1daj\u00edc\u00edch typ\u016f p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 m\u00e1lo, nelze zodpov\u011bdn\u011b ur\u010dit limit. Je pak pro zna\u010dnou \u010d\u00e1st \u00fatvar\u016f zbyte\u010dn\u011b p\u0159\u00edsn\u00fd nebo zbyte\u010dn\u011b m\u00edrn\u00fd, pop\u0159. oboj\u00ed. Stejn\u011b tak stanoven\u00ed m\u00e9n\u011b p\u0159\u00edsn\u00fdch limit\u016f m\u00e1 na prvn\u00ed pohled m\u00e9n\u011b viditeln\u00e9 nev\u00fdhody, nap\u0159.\u00a0v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu pl\u00e1n\u016f nevyhov\u011bla zna\u010dn\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1st \u00fatvar\u016f kv\u016fli biologick\u00fdm slo\u017ek\u00e1m, ale proto\u017ee souvisej\u00edc\u00ed fyzik\u00e1ln\u011b\u00ad\u2011chemick\u00e9 ukazatele byly vyhovuj\u00edc\u00ed, nebylo mo\u017en\u00e9 racion\u00e1ln\u011b navrhnout p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e1 opat\u0159en\u00ed. Z\u00e1rove\u0148 na evropsk\u00e9 \u00farovni se objevuje snaha sjednotit zna\u010dn\u011b rozd\u00edln\u00e9 limity dobr\u00e9ho ekologick\u00e9ho stavu, a\u00a0to sice neur\u010den\u00edm jednotn\u00fdch hodnot, ale harmonizac\u00ed v\u00fdsledku biologick\u00fdch slo\u017eek a\u00a0v\u0161eobecn\u00fdch fyzik\u00e1ln\u011b\u00ad\u2011chemick\u00fdch ukazatel\u016f: harmonizace hodnocen\u00ed biologick\u00fdch slo\u017eek na evropsk\u00e9 \u00farovni u\u017e prob\u00edh\u00e1, a\u00a0to procesem interkalibrace.<\/p>\n\"Prchalova-17-a-18\"<\/a>\n

Obr.\u00a017. a\u00a018. Pod\u00edl skupin \u00fatvar\u016f kategorie \u0159eka se stejn\u00fdm limitem BSK5<\/sub> podle p\u016fvodn\u00ed typologie (vlevo) a\u00a0typologie v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu (vpravo); zdroj dat: Eionet Central Data Repository a\u00a0Reporting povod\u00ed 2016
\nFig. 17. and 18. Proportion of groups of river water bodies with the same limit of BOD5<\/sub>\u00a0\u2013 the 1st<\/sup> plan (left panel) and the 2nd<\/sup> plan (right panel); data source: Eionet Central Data Repository and River Basin Management Plans Reporting 2016<\/h6>\n

Ur\u010dit spr\u00e1vnost navr\u017een\u00e9 typologie nen\u00ed bez ov\u011b\u0159en\u00ed biologick\u00fdch a\u00a0v\u0161eobecn\u00fdch fyzik\u00e1ln\u011b\u00ad\u2011chemick\u00fdch ukazatel\u016f mo\u017en\u00e9, p\u0159esto v\u0161ak ji\u017e nyn\u00ed je mo\u017en\u00e9 pochybovat, jestli byla typologie v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu adekv\u00e1tn\u011b nastavena. Z\u00e1rove\u0148 ale nelze v\u00a0r\u00e1mci t\u0159et\u00edho cyklu bez vyhodnocen\u00ed n\u00e1sledk\u016f z\u00e1sadn\u011b pozm\u011bnit typologii, nebo\u0165 by stejn\u011b jako v\u00a0druh\u00e9m cyklu mohla nastat situace, kdy v\u00fdsledky hodnocen\u00ed stavu nejdou vzhledem ke zm\u011bn\u00e1m metodik porovn\u00e1vat, a\u00a0tud\u00ed\u017e chyb\u00ed zp\u011btn\u00e1 vazba t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se efektivnosti navr\u017een\u00fdch a\u00a0proveden\u00fdch opat\u0159en\u00ed. M\u011bla by se tedy ud\u011blat anal\u00fdza p\u0159\u00ednos\u016f a\u00a0nev\u00fdhod zm\u011bn v\u010detn\u011b d\u016fsledk\u016f v\u00a0hodnocen\u00ed ekologick\u00e9ho stavu a\u00a0podle toho citliv\u011b zv\u00e1\u017eit \u00fapravu typologie.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Surface water body delineation and setting a typology are one of the initial steps during Water Framework Directive implementation (WFD) [1]. The first delineation and typology was prepared in 2004\u20132005 for the first plans, but all the results were significantly changed in the second cycle 2009\u20132010.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":3273,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[86,88],"tags":[795,789,794,791,786],"coauthors":[758,757,759],"class_list":["post-3344","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hydraulics-hydrology-and-hydrogeology","category-informatics-cartography-in-water-management","tag-ecological-status","tag-river-basin-management-plan","tag-surface-water-body-typology","tag-water-body","tag-water-framework-directive"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3344","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3344"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3344\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30386,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3344\/revisions\/30386"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3273"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3344"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3344"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3344"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3344"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}