{"id":1303,"date":"2015-12-10T14:57:27","date_gmt":"2015-12-10T14:57:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/?p=1303"},"modified":"2024-07-16T10:16:28","modified_gmt":"2024-07-16T09:16:28","slug":"risk-assessment-of-drying-up-of-small-streams-in-the-czech-republic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/2015\/12\/risk-assessment-of-drying-up-of-small-streams-in-the-czech-republic\/","title":{"rendered":"Risk assessment of drying up of small streams in the Czech Republic"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4><i class=\"fa fa-exclamation-circle fa-3x pull-left\"><\/i> This article is available in Czech only. For translation or more information on this topic, please contact author.<\/h4>\n<h2>Souhrn<\/h2>\n<p>Pro \u010ceskou republiku byla navr\u017eena kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed z\u00a0hlediska rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f (I. a\u017e IV. \u0159\u00e1d podle Strahlera). Byly stanoveny t\u0159i stupn\u011b rizika (mal\u00e9, st\u0159edn\u00ed a\u00a0velk\u00e9) pro detailn\u00ed plo\u0161ky povod\u00ed (povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du). Stupn\u011b rizika byly definov\u00e1ny na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b hodnot vybran\u00fdch abiotick\u00fdch charakteristik povod\u00ed a\u00a0jejich kombinac\u00ed. V\u00fdb\u011br charakteristik a\u00a0jejich hrani\u010dn\u00ed hodnoty byly odvozeny metodou klasifika\u010dn\u00edch strom\u016f. Klasifikov\u00e1ny byly lokality, kter\u00e9 byly rozd\u011bleny do\u00a0skupin podle toho, zda na\u00a0nich bylo zji\u0161t\u011bno vysych\u00e1n\u00ed. Vysych\u00e1n\u00ed bylo detekov\u00e1no metodou retrospektivn\u00ed biologick\u00e9 indikace. Tato nov\u00e1 metoda, zalo\u017een\u00e1 na\u00a0anal\u00fdze makrozoobentosu, byla vyvinuta na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b komplexn\u00edho v\u00fdzkumu vysychaj\u00edc\u00edch i\u00a0permanentn\u00edch tok\u016f v\u00a0obdob\u00ed 2012\u20132015. Pomoc\u00ed uveden\u00e9 metody bylo vyhodnoceno 332 lokalit (1\u2009362 vzork\u016f), sledovan\u00fdch na\u00a0drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch toc\u00edch \u010cR v\u00a0rozmez\u00ed let 1997 a\u017e 2015. V\u00fdsledn\u00fd stupe\u0148 rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f pro vytvo\u0159en\u00ed mapy byl odvozen pomoc\u00ed metody klasifika\u010dn\u00edch strom\u016f z\u00a0deficitu sr\u00e1\u017eek, typu krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu, pod\u00edlu hornin s\u00a0obsahem j\u00edlovc\u016f, parametr\u016f geomorfologick\u00fdch a\u00a0z\u00a0pod\u00edlu stojat\u00fdch vod v\u00a0povod\u00ed. \u00dazem\u00ed s\u00a0mal\u00fdm rizikem vysych\u00e1n\u00ed p\u0159edstavuje 45,3\u00a0%, se st\u0159edn\u00edm 23,3\u00a0% a\u00a0s\u00a0velk\u00fdm rizikem 31,3\u00a0% rozlohy \u010cR. Vysoce rizikov\u00e1 jsou povod\u00ed s\u00a0p\u0159evahou orn\u00e9 p\u016fdy a\u00a0pod\u00edlem vodn\u00edch ploch v\u011bt\u0161\u00edm ne\u017e 1\u00a0\u2030. Kategorizace m\u00e1 slou\u017eit jako podklad pro rozhodovac\u00ed procesy zejm\u00e9na pro management vodn\u00edho hospod\u00e1\u0159stv\u00ed, zem\u011bd\u011blstv\u00ed a\u00a0ochrany p\u0159\u00edrody.<\/p>\n<h2>\u00davod<\/h2>\n<p>Sucho je fenom\u00e9n, kter\u00fd je obt\u00ed\u017en\u00e9 jednozna\u010dn\u011b definovat, p\u0159esto\u017ee je mu v\u011bnov\u00e1na zna\u010dn\u00e1 pozornost i\u00a0mimo oblasti s\u00a0typicky aridn\u00edm klimatem. Dopady sucha se v\u00a0posledn\u00edch letech zab\u00fdv\u00e1 i\u00a0\u0159ada projekt\u016f ve\u00a0st\u0159edn\u00ed Evrop\u011b. Na\u00a0problematiku sucha lze nahl\u00ed\u017eet z\u00a0r\u016fzn\u00fdch hledisek, komplexn\u00ed pohled s\u00a0akcentem na\u00a0ekologick\u00e9 aspekty v\u00a0akvatick\u00fdch syst\u00e9mech nab\u00edz\u00ed v\u00a0mezin\u00e1rodn\u00edm m\u011b\u0159\u00edtku monografie Drought and aquatic ecosystems [1]. Sucho v\u00a0\u010desk\u00fdch zem\u00edch je v\u0161estrann\u011b vyhodnoceno v\u00a0aktu\u00e1ln\u011b vydan\u00e9 monografii zpracovan\u00e9 t\u00fdmem odborn\u00edk\u016f pod veden\u00edm profesor\u016f Br\u00e1zdila a\u00a0Trnky [2]. \u010cesk\u00e1 republika nebyla v\u00a0minulosti pova\u017eov\u00e1na za\u00a0zemi bezprost\u0159edn\u011b ohro\u017eenou suchem, a\u010dkoliv se obdob\u00ed sucha s\u00a0nezanedbateln\u00fdmi d\u016fsledky vyskytovala i\u00a0v\u00a0minulosti [2\u20136]. Situace se zm\u011bnila na\u00a0p\u0159elomu tis\u00edcilet\u00ed, zejm\u00e9na po\u00a0extr\u00e9mn\u00edm pr\u016fb\u011bhu po\u010das\u00ed v\u00a0roce 2003 [7] a\u00a0tak\u00e9 v\u00a0roce 2015, kdy byla nap\u0159.\u00a0na\u00a0\u0159ad\u011b tok\u016f zaznamen\u00e1na historick\u00e1 minima za\u00a0obdob\u00ed cel\u00e9ho p\u0159\u00edstrojov\u00e9ho sledov\u00e1n\u00ed [8]. Fenom\u00e9n sucha se tak dostal do\u00a0pop\u0159ed\u00ed z\u00e1jmu \u0159ady resort\u016f st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy, zejm\u00e9na Ministerstva zem\u011bd\u011blstv\u00ed a\u00a0Ministerstva \u017eivotn\u00edho prost\u0159ed\u00ed. Oba resorty byly na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b Usnesen\u00ed k\u00a0p\u0159\u00edprav\u011b realizace opat\u0159en\u00ed pro zm\u00edrn\u011bn\u00ed negativn\u00edch dopad\u016f sucha a\u00a0nedostatku vody vl\u00e1dou \u010cR pov\u011b\u0159eny zpracovat b\u011bhem dvou let koncepci ochrany p\u0159ed n\u00e1sledky sucha [9].<\/p>\n<p>Pro tvorbu koncepce budou d\u016fle\u017eit\u00fdmi vstupy jak identifikace p\u0159\u00ed\u010din v\u00fdskytu sucha, tak kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed z\u00a0hlediska m\u00edry rizika v\u00fdskytu sucha, proto\u017ee do\u00a0oblast\u00ed s\u00a0vysok\u00fdm rizikem by m\u011bla b\u00fdt sm\u011b\u0159ov\u00e1na jednotliv\u00e1 opat\u0159en\u00ed k\u00a0omezen\u00ed n\u00e1sledk\u016f sucha. Z\u00e1sadn\u00edm vstupem by tak\u00e9 m\u011bla b\u00fdt znalost \u00fa\u010dinnosti jednotliv\u00fdch typ\u016f opat\u0159en\u00ed.<\/p>\n<p>K\u00a0vymezen\u00ed rizikov\u00fdch \u00fazem\u00ed lze p\u0159istupovat r\u016fzn\u011b podle toho, zda je sledov\u00e1no sucho meteorologick\u00e9, hydrologick\u00e9, zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00e9 nebo socioekonomick\u00e9. Z\u00e1kladn\u00edm p\u0159\u00edstupem pro toto vymezen\u00ed je vyu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed index\u016f sucha r\u016fzn\u00e9ho typu; p\u0159ehled a\u00a0hodnocen\u00ed jejich p\u0159ednost\u00ed a\u00a0slabin viz [2, 10]. \u010casto jsou pou\u017e\u00edv\u00e1ny indexy zalo\u017een\u00e9 na\u00a0meteorologick\u00fdch datech, nap\u0159.\u00a0v\u00a0evropsk\u00e9m m\u011b\u0159\u00edtku byla navr\u017eena klasifikace \u00fazem\u00ed na\u00a0\u00farovni kombinovan\u00fdch \u00fazemn\u00edch celk\u016f NUTS (Nomenclature of Units for Territorial Statistics), zalo\u017een\u00e1 na\u00a0vyu\u017eit\u00ed indexu SPEI (Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiation Index) [11]. V\u00a0\u010cR jsou z\u00a0pohledu sucha meteorologick\u00e1 data tak\u00e9 intenzivn\u011b analyzov\u00e1na (viz<br \/>\nwww.chmi.cz a [8]). Kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b hodnocen\u00ed pomoc\u00ed n\u011bkolika klimatick\u00fdch index\u016f je uvedena v\u00a0Atlasu podneb\u00ed \u010ceska [12]. Hodnocen\u00edm sucha zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00e9ho s\u00a0d\u016frazem na\u00a0jeho kr\u00e1tkodobou predikci se intenzivn\u011b v\u011bnuje \u00dastav agrosyst\u00e9m\u016f a\u00a0bioklimatologie na\u00a0Mendelov\u011b univerzit\u011b v\u00a0Brn\u011b (www.intersucho.cz). Identifikaci zraniteln\u00fdch oblast\u00ed z\u00a0hlediska nedostatku vodn\u00edch zdroj\u016f pro sou\u010dasnost i\u00a0budouc\u00ed obdob\u00ed provedli nap\u0159.\u00a0Beran a\u00a0Hanel [13], po\u010detn\u00e9 dal\u0161\u00ed p\u0159\u00edstupy k\u00a0hodnocen\u00ed rizik spojen\u00fdch se suchem jsou uvedeny v monografii o suchu [2].<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-1.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"483\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1185 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-1.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-1\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-1.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-1-300x181.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/483;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6 class=\"05POPISKYobrazku\">Obr.\u00a01. Rozm\u00edst\u011bn\u00ed lokalit na\u00a0mal\u00fdch vodn\u00edch toc\u00edch klasifikovan\u00fdch metodou retrospektivn\u00ed bioindikace do\u00a0t\u0159\u00edd podle permanence pr\u016ftoku: PER\u00a0\u2013 toky st\u00e1le tekouc\u00ed, VUL\u00a0\u2013 toky vysychaj\u00edc\u00ed nepravideln\u011b, INT\u00a0\u2013 toky vysychaj\u00edc\u00ed pravideln\u011b<br \/>\nFig. 1. The distribution of sites used in the analyses, classified by the retrospective bioindication method into groups according to the permanence of flow: PER (permanent)\u00a0\u2013 a\u00a0constant flow, VUL (vulnerable)\u00a0\u2013 an irregular drying up, INT (intermittent)\u00a0\u2013 a\u00a0regular drying up<\/h6>\n<p>Jedn\u00edm z\u00a0nejn\u00e1padn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch projev\u016f epizod sucha je pokles hladin vodn\u00edch tok\u016f. Toto tzv.\u00a0hydrologick\u00e9 sucho je intenzivn\u011b studov\u00e1no na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b hodnocen\u00ed \u00fadaj\u016f z\u00a0hydrologick\u00fdch stanic, kter\u00e9 jsou obvykle um\u00edst\u011bny na\u00a0v\u011bt\u0161\u00edch toc\u00edch. Sucho je pro tento \u00fa\u010del definov\u00e1no ur\u010ditou hranic\u00ed zabezpe\u010den\u00e9ho pr\u016ftoku (zpravidla hranice Q95, ale nap\u0159.\u00a0i\u00a0Q<sub>355<\/sub>\u00a0apod.). Velmi n\u00edzk\u00e9 pr\u016ftoky, a\u00a0zejm\u00e9na pr\u016ftoky nulov\u00e9, maj\u00ed z\u00e1va\u017en\u00e9 dopady na\u00a0p\u0159e\u017eit\u00ed \u017eiv\u00fdch organism\u016f (bioty) s\u00a0konsekvencemi nejen pro jakost vod, ale i\u00a0pro jednotliv\u00e9 ekosyst\u00e9my v\u00a0krajin\u011b, pro kter\u00e9 je voda jedn\u00edm z\u00a0p\u0159edpoklad\u016f samotn\u00e9 existence. Problematice n\u00edzk\u00fdch, nulov\u00fdch a\u00a0takzvan\u011b minim\u00e1ln\u011b p\u0159\u00edpustn\u00fdch pr\u016ftok\u016f byla v\u011bnov\u00e1na pozornost ji\u017e v\u00a0minulosti, v\u00a0\u010cR viz\u00a0nap\u0159.\u00a0pr\u00e1ce\u00a0M. Zelinky [14]. V\u00a0obdob\u00ed implementace sm\u011brnice 2000\/60\/ES (R\u00e1mcov\u00e1 sm\u011brnice o\u00a0vod\u00e1ch) [15] je akcentov\u00e1na problematika ekologick\u00e9ho stavu vodn\u00edch \u00fatvar\u016f povrchov\u00fdch vod a\u00a0d\u00edky tomu jsou koncepty optim\u00e1ln\u00edho stanoven\u00ed minim\u00e1ln\u00edch z\u016fstatkov\u00fdch pr\u016ftok\u016f d\u00e1le rozv\u00edjeny. Kategorizaci \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky do\u00a0\u010dty\u0159 typ\u016f oblast\u00ed v\u00a0z\u00e1vislosti na\u00a0charakteru hydrologick\u00e9ho re\u017eimu a\u00a0na\u00a0kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00fdch procesech, kter\u00e9 se v\u00a0dan\u00e9 oblasti pod\u00edlej\u00ed na\u00a0tvorb\u011b odtoku, navrhli Mrkvi\u010dkov\u00e1 a\u00a0Balv\u00edn v\u00a0souvislosti s\u00a0n\u00e1vrhem postupu stanoven\u00ed minim\u00e1ln\u00edch z\u016fstatkov\u00fdch pr\u016ftok\u016f [16].<\/p>\n<p>Z\u00a0hlediska typu tok\u016f, na\u00a0kter\u00fdch doch\u00e1z\u00ed v\u00a0obdob\u00edch sucha k\u00a0nejmarkantn\u011bj\u0161\u00edm zm\u011bn\u00e1m, pat\u0159\u00ed k\u00a0nejohro\u017een\u011bj\u0161\u00edm toky men\u0161\u00ed, I. a\u017e IV. \u0159\u00e1du podle Strahlera [17]. Jejich hydrologick\u00fd re\u017eim v\u00edce z\u00e1vis\u00ed na\u00a0lok\u00e1ln\u00edch podm\u00ednk\u00e1ch v\u00a0konkr\u00e9tn\u00edm mal\u00e9m povod\u00ed, ne\u017e je tomu u\u00a0tok\u016f v\u011bt\u0161\u00edch. Na\u00a0v\u011bt\u0161in\u011b mal\u00fdch tok\u016f zpravidla nejsou um\u00edst\u011bny m\u011b\u0159ic\u00ed stanice a\u00a0exaktn\u00ed \u00fadaje o\u00a0jejich pr\u016ftoc\u00edch chyb\u00ed. K\u00a0v\u00fdskytu n\u00edzk\u00fdch pr\u016ftok\u016f a\u017e k\u00a0vyschnut\u00ed tok\u016f v\u0161ak objektivn\u011b doch\u00e1z\u00ed, to lze dolo\u017eit \u00fadaji z\u00a0informa\u010dn\u00edho syst\u00e9mu (IS) SALAMANDER (www.is2ms.monsms.cz)\u00a0b\u00fdval\u00e9 Zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00e9 vodohospod\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9 spr\u00e1vy (ZVHS), v\u00a0n\u011bm\u017e jsou ulo\u017eena data z\u00a0monitoringu drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f. Informace o\u00a0vyschnut\u00ed poch\u00e1z\u00ed tak\u00e9 z\u00a0ter\u00e9nn\u00edch pr\u016fzkum\u016f autor\u016f.<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-2.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"483\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1186 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-2.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-2\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-2.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-2-300x181.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/483;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr.\u00a02. Mapa deficitu sr\u00e1\u017eek: kvantily rozd\u00edl\u016f \u00fahrn\u016f sr\u00e1\u017eek a\u00a0evapotranspirace pro povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du; hodnota 0,1 odpov\u00edd\u00e1 situaci, kdy evapontraspirace p\u0159evl\u00e1d\u00e1 nad<br \/>\nsr\u00e1\u017ekami v\u00a0povod\u00ed v\u00a00\u201310\u00a0% p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f, tedy jen v\u00a0nejsu\u0161\u0161\u00edch letech; hodnota 1 odpov\u00edd\u00e1\u00a0situaci, kdy evapontraspirace p\u0159evl\u00e1d\u00e1 nad sr\u00e1\u017ekami v\u00a0povod\u00ed v\u00a091\u2013100\u00a0% p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f<br \/>\nFig. 2. Map of the rainfall deficit: quantiles of the differences between precipitation\u00a0and evapotranspiration in the 4th order catchments (the smallest hydrological units); the value 0.1 corresponds to a\u00a0situation when evapotranspiration prevails over precipitation in the catchment in 0\u201310% of cases, i.e. in the driest years; the value 1 corresponds to a\u00a0situation when evapotranspiration prevails over precipitation in the catchment in 91\u2013100% of cases<\/h6>\n<p>Pojmem vyschnut\u00ed toku je v\u00a0kontextu t\u00e9to publikace m\u00edn\u011bno \u00fapln\u00e9 vymizen\u00ed povrchov\u00e9ho pr\u016ftoku z\u00a0koryta toku (mohou zb\u00fdvat pouze izolovan\u00e9 t\u016fn\u011b bez propojen\u00ed s\u00a0povrchov\u00fdm tokem). Tento jev, zejm\u00e9na pokud nastane na\u00a0del\u0161\u00edm \u00faseku toku po\u00a0del\u0161\u00ed dobu (dny a\u017e m\u011bs\u00edce), m\u00e1 dalekos\u00e1hl\u00e9 dopady na\u00a0ekologick\u00fd stav toku i\u00a0chemick\u00e9 vlastnosti vody. Dal\u0161\u00edm v\u00fdznamn\u00fdm negativn\u00edm d\u016fsledkem vyschnut\u00ed toku je naru\u0161en\u00ed jeho funkce jako v\u00fdznamn\u00e9ho krajinn\u00e9ho prvku, nebo\u0165 toky slou\u017e\u00ed jako biokoridory. To pak vede ke\u00a0zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed fragmentace \u0159\u00ed\u010dn\u00ed s\u00edt\u011b a\u00a0degradaci jej\u00edch funkc\u00ed v\u00a0krajin\u011b.\u00a0Pr\u016ftoky ve\u00a0v\u011bt\u0161\u00edch toc\u00edch jsou i\u00a0v\u00a0podm\u00ednk\u00e1ch kulturn\u00ed krajiny do\u00a0zna\u010dn\u00e9 m\u00edry z\u00e1visl\u00e9 na\u00a0vodnosti tok\u016f ni\u017e\u0161\u00edch \u0159\u00e1d\u016f. Posuzujeme\u00ad\u00ad\u2011li \u0159\u00ed\u010dn\u00ed s\u00ed\u0165 v\u00a0\u010cR podle d\u00e9lky tok\u016f, pak pod\u00edl tok\u016f I. a\u017e IV. \u0159\u00e1du \u010din\u00ed t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 92\u00a0%. Jejich stav do\u00a0zna\u010dn\u00e9 m\u00edry odr\u00e1\u017e\u00ed stav krajiny jako celku. Znalost konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed m\u00edry rizika vyschnut\u00ed men\u0161\u00edch tok\u016f je d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e1 p\u0159inejmen\u0161\u00edm pro management vodn\u00edho hospod\u00e1\u0159stv\u00ed, zem\u011bd\u011blstv\u00ed a\u00a0ochrany p\u0159\u00edrody.<\/p>\n<p>V\u00fdzkumem vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f, jeho d\u016fsledky pro vodn\u00ed biotu a\u00a0mo\u017enostmi zp\u011btn\u00e9 (retrospektivn\u00ed) indikace epizody vyschnut\u00ed toku bioindika\u010dn\u00edmi metodami se zab\u00fdv\u00e1 t\u00fdm pracovn\u00edk\u016f V\u00fdzkumn\u00e9ho \u00fastavu vodohospod\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9ho T. G. Masaryka,\u00a0v.v.i., Mendelovy univerzity a\u00a0firmy WELL Consulting,\u00a0s.\u00a0r.\u00a0o., v\u00a0projektu podporovan\u00e9m Technologickou agenturou \u010cR: Vysych\u00e1n\u00ed tok\u016f v\u00a0obdob\u00ed klimatick\u00e9 zm\u011bny: predikce rizika a\u00a0biologick\u00e1 indikace epizod vyschnut\u00ed jako nov\u00e9 metody pro management vodn\u00edho hospod\u00e1\u0159stv\u00ed a\u00a0\u00fadr\u017eby krajiny (projekt \u010d.\u00a0TA02020395, akronym BIOSUCHO).<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-3.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"483\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1187 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-3.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-3\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-3.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-3-300x181.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/483;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr.\u00a03. Mapa pod\u00edlu j\u00edlovc\u016f v\u00a0podlo\u017e\u00ed v\u00a0povod\u00edch IV. \u0159\u00e1du<br \/>\nFig. 3. Map of the share of claystone bedrock in the 4<sup>th<\/sup> order catchments<\/h6>\n<p>Retrospektivn\u00ed indikace vysych\u00e1n\u00ed tok\u016f je zalo\u017eena na\u00a0anal\u00fdz\u00e1ch makrozoobentosu. Makrozoobentos, \u010dili makroskopi\u010dt\u00ed bezobratl\u00ed \u017eivo\u010dichov\u00e9 ob\u00fdvaj\u00edc\u00ed dno vodn\u00edch biotop\u016f, citliv\u011b reaguj\u00ed na\u00a0epizody vyschnut\u00ed toku. Doch\u00e1z\u00ed ke\u00a0kvalitativn\u00edm i\u00a0kvantitativn\u00edm zm\u011bn\u00e1m ve\u00a0struktu\u0159e spole\u010denstev, kter\u00e9 jsou identifikovateln\u00e9 p\u0159i hodnocen\u00ed standardn\u011b odeb\u00edran\u00fdch vzork\u016f makrozoobentosu, a\u00a0to po\u00a0dobu nejm\u00e9n\u011b jednoho roku po\u00a0vyschnut\u00ed. Uvedenou metodou byly vyhodnoceny vzorky makrozoobentosu nejen z\u00a0projektu BIOSUCHO, ale i\u00a0vhodn\u00e9 vzorky ulo\u017een\u00e9 v\u00a0datab\u00e1zi IS SALAMANDER, vytvo\u0159en\u00e9ho v\u00a0letech 1997 a\u017e 2010.<\/p>\n<p>Jedn\u00edm z\u00a0c\u00edl\u016f projektu BIOSUCHO je tak\u00e9 vymezen\u00ed oblast\u00ed, v\u00a0nich\u017e je zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00e9 riziko vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f (DVT). V\u00a0tomto p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku se proto zab\u00fdv\u00e1me kategorizac\u00ed \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR podle m\u00edry rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f. Kategorizace je provedena na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b abiotick\u00fdch charakteristik povod\u00ed, zpracovateln\u00fdch do\u00a0vrstev GIS, a\u00a0v\u00fdsledk\u016f hodnocen\u00ed makrozoobentosu z\u00a0obou uveden\u00fdch zdroj\u016f.<\/p>\n<p>Pr\u016ftoky v\u00a0toc\u00edch obecn\u011b jsou ovliv\u0148ov\u00e1ny \u0159adou faktor\u016f se synergick\u00fdm nebo antagonistick\u00fdm \u00fa\u010dinkem. Jedn\u00e1 se o\u00a0jevy klimatick\u00e9, kter\u00e9 jsou v\u00a0\u010dase prom\u011bnliv\u00e9 a\u00a0\u010dlov\u011bkem minim\u00e1ln\u011b ovlivniteln\u00e9, o\u00a0p\u0159ev\u00e1\u017en\u011b stabiln\u00ed charakteristiky geologick\u00e9 a\u00a0geomorfologick\u00e9, o\u00a0slo\u017eit\u011b hydrogeologicky podm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e9 pom\u011bry v\u00a0podzemn\u00edch vod\u00e1ch a\u00a0v\u00a0neposledn\u00ed \u0159ad\u011b o\u00a0vlivy lidsk\u00e9 \u010dinnosti, kter\u00e9 je mo\u017en\u00e9 korigovat (odb\u011bry povrchov\u00fdch a\u00a0podzemn\u00edch vod, manipulace s\u00a0pr\u016ftoky, \u00fadr\u017eba krajiny, renaturace \u010di revitalizace tok\u016f).<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-4.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"483\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1188 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-4.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-4\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-4.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-4-300x181.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/483;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr.\u00a04. Mapa v\u00fdskytu v\u00fdznamn\u00fdch geomorfologick\u00fdch hranic v\u00a0povod\u00edch IV. \u0159\u00e1du<br \/>\nFig. 4. Map of the occurrence of important geomorphological boundaries within 4<sup>th<\/sup> order catchments<\/h6>\n<p>Vstupn\u00ed v\u00fdb\u011br abiotick\u00fdch charakteristik pro tuto studii byl proveden podle v\u00fdsledk\u016f p\u0159edchoz\u00edch v\u00fdzkum\u016f. Z\u00a0liter\u00e1rn\u00edch \u00fadaj\u016f byla p\u0159evzata informace o\u00a0tom, \u017ee povod\u00ed na\u00a0j\u00edlovc\u00edch vykazuj\u00ed signifikantn\u011b vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed hodnoty nedostatkov\u00fdch objem\u016f ne\u017e povod\u00ed s\u00a0jinou litologi\u00ed [18]. V\u00a0r\u00e1mci vlastn\u00edch p\u0159edb\u011b\u017en\u00fdch anal\u00fdz v\u00a0projektu BIOSUCHO bylo provedeno podrobn\u00e9 hydrogeologick\u00e9 posouzen\u00ed situace na\u00a087 \u00fasec\u00edch tok\u016f (lokalit\u00e1ch), z\u00a0nich\u017e 32 bylo vysychav\u00fdch a\u00a055 nevysychav\u00fdch [19]. Jako nejv\u00fdznamn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed d\u016fvod vysych\u00e1n\u00ed byl uveden odb\u011br podzemn\u00ed vody v\u00a0povod\u00ed, zv\u011bt\u0161en\u00ed mocnosti kvart\u00e9rn\u00edch n\u00e1plavov\u00fdch ulo\u017eenin spojen\u00e9 se zm\u011bnou sp\u00e1du toku a\u00a0v\u00fdskyt \u0159\u00e1dov\u011b propustn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch vlo\u017eek hornin v\u00a0povod\u00ed. Jako potenci\u00e1ln\u011b rizikov\u00e1 byla na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b t\u00e9to studie hodnocena povod\u00ed drobn\u00fdch tok\u016f, kter\u00fdmi proch\u00e1zej\u00ed hranice mezi geomorfologick\u00fdmi podcelky s\u00a0poklesem st\u0159edn\u00ed v\u00fd\u0161ky ter\u00e9nu v\u011bt\u0161\u00edm ne\u017e 200\u2008m a\/nebo zm\u011bnou sklonu svah\u016f. Pro n\u011bkter\u00e9\u00a0z\u00a0uveden\u00fdch charakteristik v\u0161ak bylo problematick\u00e9 z\u00edskat kompletn\u00ed a\u00a0konzistentn\u00ed \u00fadaje pro vrstvy GIS v\u00a0p\u0159im\u011b\u0159en\u00e9 podrobnosti. Pro dal\u0161\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed byla proto jako pou\u017eiteln\u00e1 d\u00e1le zpracov\u00e1na charakteristika v\u00fdskytu v\u00fdznamn\u00fdch tektonick\u00fdch lini\u00ed a\u00a0vyhodnocen pod\u00edl krasov\u00fdch a\u00a0pseudokrasov\u00fdch jev\u016f jako ur\u010dit\u00fd z\u00e1stupn\u00fd ukazatel k\u00a0propustnosti podlo\u017e\u00ed v\u00a0povod\u00ed. Hranice mezi geomorfologick\u00fdmi jednotkami byly d\u00e1le zpracov\u00e1ny podrobn\u011bji\u00a0\u2013 na\u00a0\u00farovni okrsk\u016f (viz\u00a0Metodiku).<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-5.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"483\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1189 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-5.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-5\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-5.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-5-300x181.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/483;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr.\u00a05. Mapa pod\u00edlu kras\u016f a\u00a0pseudokras\u016f v\u00a0povod\u00edch IV. \u0159\u00e1du<br \/>\nFig. 5. Map of the share of the karstic and pseudo\u00ad\u2011karstic areas in the 4<sup>th<\/sup> order catchments<\/h6>\n<p>Z\u00a0antropogenn\u00edch vliv\u016f byl jako d\u00e1le vyu\u017eiteln\u00fd vyhodnocen ukazatel typu krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu. Vliv r\u016fzn\u00fdch typ\u016f povrch\u016f na\u00a0toky z\u00a0hlediska kvalitativn\u00edho i\u00a0kvantitativn\u00edho byl prok\u00e1z\u00e1n [20]. Na\u00a0pr\u016ftoky v\u00a0toc\u00edch maj\u00ed objektivn\u011b vliv tak\u00e9 n\u00e1dr\u017ee r\u016fzn\u00e9ho typu v\u00a0jejich povod\u00ed, proto byl za\u0159azen tak\u00e9 pod\u00edl ploch stojat\u00fdch vod v\u00a0hodnocen\u00e9m povod\u00ed.<\/p>\n<p>V\u00fdsti\u017enost klasifikace \u00fazem\u00ed, tedy i\u00a0v\u00fdb\u011br jednotliv\u00fdch mapov\u00fdch vrstev a\u00a0pot\u00e9 jejich kombinac\u00ed, byla posuzov\u00e1na pomoc\u00ed informac\u00ed o\u00a0re\u00e1ln\u00e9m vyschnut\u00ed tok\u016f (pozorov\u00e1n\u00ed anebo m\u011b\u0159en\u00ed v\u00a0ter\u00e9nu) a\u00a0podle v\u00fdsledk\u016f hodnocen\u00ed biologick\u00fdch vzork\u016f nov\u011b vyvinutou metodou retrospektivn\u00ed indikace vyschnut\u00ed toku podle makrozoobentosu [21].<\/p>\n<p>C\u00edlem studie tedy byla kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR z\u00a0hlediska rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f v\u00a0podob\u011b mapy v\u00a0m\u011b\u0159\u00edtku 1 : 200\u2009000. D\u00edl\u010d\u00edmi c\u00edli bylo:\u00a0(i) posouzen\u00ed v\u00fdznamnosti abiotick\u00fdch charakteristik \u00fazemn\u00edch jednotek na\u00a0\u00farovni povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du z\u00a0hlediska rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f, a\u00a0to na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b informac\u00ed z\u00edskan\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edm\u00fdmi (pozorov\u00e1n\u00ed, m\u011b\u0159en\u00ed) i\u00a0nep\u0159\u00edm\u00fdmi (retrospektivn\u00ed bioindikace) metodami a\u00a0(ii) konstrukce mapy rizika na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b kombinace vybran\u00fdch vrstev, tj.\u00a0kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed. Kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed bude od\u00a0r.\u00a02016 k\u00a0dispozici v\u00a0port\u00e1lu Hydroekologick\u00e9ho informa\u010dn\u00edho syst\u00e9mu HEIS (www.heisvuv.cz).<\/p>\n<h2>Metodika<\/h2>\n<h3>Zdroje dat<\/h3>\n<p>Za\u00a0drobn\u00e9 vodn\u00ed toky pro \u00fa\u010del t\u00e9to studie pova\u017eujeme toky od\u00a0I. do\u00a0IV. \u0159\u00e1du podle Strahlera. R\u00e1mcov\u011b se toto vymezen\u00ed shoduje s\u00a0pojet\u00edm drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f, kter\u00e9 byly v\u00a0gesci b\u00fdval\u00e9 ZVHS. Data pou\u017eit\u00e1 pro konstrukci map lze rozd\u011blit na\u00a0informace o\u00a0\u017eiv\u00e9 slo\u017ece\u00a0\u2013 makrozoobentosu (data biotick\u00e1) a\u00a0na\u00a0informace o\u00a0abiotick\u00fdch charakteristik\u00e1ch. Vzorky makrozoobentosu, odeb\u00edran\u00e9 pomoc\u00ed ru\u010dn\u00ed s\u00edt\u011b v\u00a0jarn\u00ed a\u00a0podzimn\u00ed sezon\u011b semikvantitativn\u00ed metodou PERLA [22], poch\u00e1zely ze sledov\u00e1n\u00ed modelov\u00fdch lokalit v\u00a0projektu BIOSUCHO (celkem 23 lokalit, sledovan\u00e9 obdob\u00ed 2012\u20132014, celkov\u00fd po\u010det vzork\u016f 110). Dal\u0161\u00edm zdrojem dat byla datab\u00e1ze IS SALAMANDER, kter\u00e1 obsahuje \u00fadaje o\u00a0odb\u011brech makrozoobentosu na\u00a0900 lokalit\u00e1ch, a\u00a0to jak antropogenn\u011b ovlivn\u011bn\u00fdch, tak v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edrod\u011b bl\u00edzk\u00e9m stavu, na\u00a0kter\u00fdch bylo provedeno t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 5\u2009000 odb\u011br\u016f. Data z\u00a0tohoto zdroje byla pro anal\u00fdzy, jejich\u017e v\u00fdsledky jsou prezentovan\u00e9 v\u00a0tomto \u010dl\u00e1nku, o\u010di\u0161t\u011bna od\u00a0\u00fadaj\u016f z\u00a0lokalit vykazuj\u00edc\u00edch zn\u00e1mky organick\u00e9ho zne\u010di\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed (hodnoceno p\u0159ednostn\u011b podle hodnot saprobn\u00edho indexu, rutinn\u011b u\u017e\u00edvan\u00e9 bioindika\u010dn\u00ed metody [23]) s\u00a0ohledem na\u00a0velikost toku na\u00a0hranici oligo- a\u00a0beta\u00ad\u2011mezosaprobity, resp. st\u0159edu beta\u00ad\u2011mezosaprobity. D\u00e1le byly vy\u0159azeny lokality, na\u00a0nich\u017e byly zji\u0161t\u011bny n\u00edzk\u00e9 hodnoty pH (s\u00a0v\u00fdskytem minim\u00e1ln\u00edch hodnot &lt; 6, nebo medi\u00e1nov\u00fdch hodnot &lt; 7). Vzorky makrozoobentosu z\u00a0takto ovlivn\u011bn\u00fdch lokalit mohou vykazovat zm\u011bny podobn\u00e9 t\u011bm, kter\u00e9 jsou vyvol\u00e1ny vysych\u00e1n\u00edm, a\u00a0to by vedlo k\u00a0chybn\u00fdm v\u00fdsledk\u016fm prov\u00e1d\u011bn\u00fdch anal\u00fdz. Do\u00a0dal\u0161\u00edho hodnocen\u00ed byly za\u0159azeny lokality sledovan\u00e9 nejm\u00e9n\u011b jeden rok v\u00a0jarn\u00edm a\u00a0podzimn\u00edm aspektu v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b minim\u00e1ln\u011b antropogenn\u011b ovlivn\u011bn\u00fdch tok\u016f, co\u017e byly lokality syst\u00e9mu PERLA, tzv.\u00a0referen\u010dn\u00ed [24], kter\u00e9 byly t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 v\u00fdlu\u010dn\u011b nevysychaj\u00edc\u00ed. V\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b dat z\u00a0takzvan\u00e9ho standardn\u00edho monitoringu ZVHS, mezi nimi\u017e byly ponech\u00e1ny i\u00a0toky s\u00a0ovlivn\u011bn\u00fdm hydrologick\u00fdm re\u017eimem nebo s\u00a0\u00fapravami koryt, byly hodnoceny lokality sledovan\u00e9 minim\u00e1ln\u011b dva roky. Z\u00a0uveden\u00fdch zdroj\u016f poch\u00e1zela tak\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1st dat abiotick\u00fdch, vztahuj\u00edc\u00edch se k\u00a0lokalit\u00e1m a\u00a0vzork\u016fm, dal\u0161\u00ed \u00fadaje poch\u00e1zely z\u00a0vrstev geografick\u00fdch informa\u010dn\u00edch syst\u00e9m\u016f (GIS), jejich\u017e p\u016fvod je pops\u00e1n n\u00ed\u017ee.<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-6.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"483\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1190 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-6.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-6\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-6.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-6-300x181.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/483;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr.\u00a06. Mapa v\u00fdskytu v\u00fdznamn\u00fdch geologick\u00fdch poruch a\u00a0zlom\u016f v\u00a0povod\u00edch IV. \u0159\u00e1du<br \/>\nFig. 6. Map of the occurrence of important geological faults in the 4<sup>th<\/sup> order catchments<\/h6>\n<h3>Klasifikace lokalit<\/h3>\n<p>Jednotliv\u00e9 vzorky byly vyhodnoceny metodou rektrospektivn\u00ed bioindikace [21] do\u00a0t\u0159\u00ed t\u0159\u00edd:<\/p>\n<p>INT\u00a0\u2013 intermitentn\u00ed (intermittent)\u00a0\u2013 vysychaj\u00edc\u00ed \u0159\u00e1dov\u011b na\u00a0t\u00fddny na\u00a0\u00faseku toku del\u0161\u00edm ne\u017e 1\u2008km;<\/p>\n<p>VUL\u00a0\u2013 zraniteln\u00e9 (vulnerable)\u00a0\u2013 vysychaj\u00edc\u00ed nepravideln\u011b, \u0159\u00e1dov\u011b na\u00a0stovk\u00e1ch metr\u016f pouze na n\u011bkolik dn\u00ed;<\/p>\n<p>PER\u00a0\u2013 permanentn\u00ed (permanent)\u00a0\u2013 trvale tekouc\u00ed.<\/p>\n<p>Hodnocen\u00ed vzork\u016f na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b anal\u00fdzy makrozoobentosu podle uveden\u00e9 metodiky bylo p\u0159evedeno na\u00a0klasifikaci lokalit n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edm zp\u016fsobem: jako INT byla vyhodnocena lokalita v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b dvou a\u00a0v\u00edce vzork\u016f makrozoobentosu hodnocen\u00fdch jako INT, nebo jednoho vzorku INT a\u00a0jednoho \u010di v\u00edce vzork\u016f hodnocen\u00fdch jako VUL. Jako VUL byla lokalita hodnocena v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b v\u00fdskytu nejm\u00e9n\u011b dvou vzork\u016f hodnocen\u00fdch jako VUL, v\u00fdjime\u010dn\u011b tak\u00e9 p\u0159i kombinaci vzork\u016f PER a\u00a0jednoho vzorku INT. V\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b pom\u011bru v\u00fdsledk\u016f VUL : PER = 1 : 3 a\u00a0vy\u0161\u0161\u00edm ve\u00a0prosp\u011bch PER byla lokalita hodnocena jako PER. Pokud nebylo mo\u017en\u00e9 vzorek odebrat z\u00a0d\u016fvodu vyschnut\u00ed, byla dan\u00e1 sezona hodnocena jako INT.<\/p>\n<h2>Kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed<\/h2>\n<h3>\u00dazemn\u00ed jednotky pro hodnocen\u00ed<\/h3>\n<p>Kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed byla provedena na\u00a0\u00farovni hydrologick\u00e9ho povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du,\u00a0tedy detailn\u00edch plo\u0161ek povod\u00ed (http:\/\/www.dibavod.cz\/data\/text_charakteristiky_toku.pdf). Pokud je v\u00a0textu pou\u017eit pojem \u201epovod\u00ed\u201c bez dal\u0161\u00edho up\u0159esn\u011bn\u00ed (povod\u00ed Odry, povod\u00ed nad lokalitou\u00a0apod.), jsou v\u017edy m\u00edn\u011bna povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du. Vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed \u00farovn\u00ed pro hodnocen\u00ed byly \u00fatvary povrchov\u00fdch vod (http:\/\/heis.vuv.cz\/data\/spusteni\/identchk.asp?typ=96\u2008&amp;\u2008oblast=isvs_utv), tj. v\u00fdznamn\u00e9 \u00fazemn\u00ed celky pro vodohospod\u00e1\u0159sk\u00fd management, kter\u00e9 je mo\u017en\u00e9 agregovat do\u00a0dal\u0161\u00edch vy\u0161\u0161\u00edch jednotek.<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-7.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"483\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1191 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-7.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-7\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-7.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-7-300x181.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/483;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr. 7. Mapa pod\u00edlu nep\u0159\u00edzniv\u00e9ho druhu povrchu (typ 2) v povod\u00edch IV. \u0159\u00e1du; prezentov\u00e1n je pod\u00edl nejv\u00edce ovlivn\u011bn\u00fdch ploch (CORINE: orn\u00e1 p\u016fda, urbanizovan\u00e1 \u00fazem\u00ed a komplexn\u00ed syst\u00e9my kultur a parcel)<br \/>\nFig. 7. Map of the share of adverse type of land cover (artificial areas, arable land, complex cultivation patterns after CORINE) in the 4<sup>th<\/sup> order catchments<\/h6>\n<h3>Vrstvy GIS testovan\u00e9 pro konstrukci mapy rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f<\/h3>\n<p>Na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b v\u00fdsledk\u016f p\u0159edb\u011b\u017en\u00fdch v\u00fdzkum\u016f bylo pro hodnocen\u00ed p\u0159ipraveno sedm n\u00ed\u017ee uveden\u00fdch vrstev GIS. Prvn\u00ed z\u00a0nich je mapa deficitu sr\u00e1\u017eek, kter\u00e1 vymezuje oblasti, v\u00a0nich\u017e p\u0159evl\u00e1d\u00e1 v\u00fdpar nad sr\u00e1\u017ekami. Mapa byla konstruov\u00e1na na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b dat ze 131 bod\u016f pravideln\u00e9 \u010dtvercov\u00e9 s\u00edt\u011b o\u00a0velikosti gridu 25\u2009\u00d7\u200925\u2008km. Pro v\u00fdpo\u010det byly pou\u017eity \u010dasov\u00e9 \u0159ady teplot vzduchu a\u00a0\u00fahrn\u016f sr\u00e1\u017eek z\u00a0obdob\u00ed let 1961\u20132011 (kter\u00e9 poskytl \u010cesk\u00fd hydrometeorologick\u00fd \u00fastav\u00a0\u2013 data byla odvozena v\u00a0r\u00e1mci projektu s\u00a0n\u00e1zvem Zp\u0159esn\u011bn\u00ed dosavadn\u00edch odhad\u016f dopad\u016f klimatick\u00e9 zm\u011bny v\u00a0sektorech vodn\u00edho hospod\u00e1\u0159stv\u00ed, zem\u011bd\u011blstv\u00ed a\u00a0lesnictv\u00ed a\u00a0n\u00e1vrhy adapta\u010dn\u00edch opat\u0159en\u00ed [25] (metodika odvozen\u00ed gridov\u00fdch dat je pops\u00e1na v\u00a0\u0160t\u011bp\u00e1nkovi a kol. [26], chyb\u011bj\u00edc\u00ed nov\u011bj\u0161\u00ed data pak dopo\u010d\u00edt\u00e1na). Z\u00a0\u010dasov\u00fdch \u0159ad teplot vzduchu byla pro ka\u017ed\u00fd den vypo\u010dtena evapotranspirace podle vztahu Oudina [27]. Z\u00a0\u010dasov\u00fdch \u0159ad evapotranspirace a\u00a0sr\u00e1\u017eek byl pro ka\u017ed\u00fd bod gridov\u00e9 s\u00edt\u011b 25\u2009\u00d7\u200925\u2008km stanoven deficit sr\u00e1\u017eek (\u00fahrn sr\u00e1\u017eek, kter\u00fd chyb\u00ed v\u00a0dan\u00e9m bod\u011b k\u00a0rovnov\u00e1ze mezi v\u00fdparem a\u00a0sr\u00e1\u017ekami) podle vzorce:<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-vzorec-1.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"335\" height=\"82\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1201 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-vzorec-1.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-vzorec-1\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-vzorec-1.jpg 335w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-vzorec-1-300x73.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 335px) 100vw, 335px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 335px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 335\/82;\" \/><\/a>\n<p>kde Rd je rozd\u00edl mezi vypo\u010dten\u00fdmi hodnotami evapotranspirace a\u00a0\u00fahrn\u016f sr\u00e1\u017eek za\u00a0jeden den v\u00a0mm, EPd je vypo\u010dten\u00e1 hodnota evapotranspirace pro konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed den a\u00a0SRAd je denn\u00ed \u00fahrn sr\u00e1\u017eek v\u00a0mm. Pro ka\u017ed\u00fd gridov\u00fd bod byly z\u00a0rozd\u00edlu \u00fahrn\u016f sr\u00e1\u017eek a\u00a0evapotranspirace vypo\u010dteny kvantily rozd\u00edl\u016f \u00fahrn\u016f sr\u00e1\u017eek a\u00a0evapotranspirace po\u00a010\u00a0%. Pro tyto kvantily byly pomoc\u00ed plo\u0161n\u00e9 interpolace (u\u017e\u00edvaj\u00edc\u00ed interpola\u010dn\u00ed metody IDW a\u00a0digit\u00e1ln\u00edho modelu reli\u00e9fu) vytvo\u0159eny mapy zn\u00e1zor\u0148uj\u00edc\u00ed oblasti, v\u00a0nich\u017e u\u00a0dan\u00e9ho kvantilu p\u0159evl\u00e1d\u00e1 evapotranspirace nad sr\u00e1\u017ekami.<\/p>\n<p>Hodnoty kvantil\u016f byly p\u0159evedeny do\u00a0\u0161k\u00e1ly 0\u20131, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e 0 znamen\u00e1 minim\u00e1ln\u00ed rizikovost z\u00a0hlediska vysych\u00e1n\u00ed DVT.<\/p>\n<p>Jako dal\u0161\u00ed vhodn\u00e9 vrstvy pro dopln\u011bn\u00ed klimatick\u00e9ho modelu deficitu sr\u00e1\u017eek byly pro tvorbu v\u00fdsledn\u00e9 mapy rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed DVT vybr\u00e1ny nebo vytvo\u0159eny de novo n\u00ed\u017ee uveden\u00e9 vrstvy pro GIS a\u00a0p\u0159evedeny na\u00a0\u0161k\u00e1lu o\u00a0rozsahu 0\u20131.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Vrstvy p\u0159\u00edrodn\u00edch podm\u00ednek<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>V\u00fdskyt hornin s\u00a0obsahem j\u00edlovc\u016f v\u00a0povod\u00ed (http:\/\/www.geology.cz\/extranet\/mapy) (0 = \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 j\u00edlovce v\u00a0podlo\u017e\u00ed, 1 = 100\u00a0% j\u00edlovc\u016f v\u00a0podlo\u017e\u00ed).<\/p>\n<p>V\u00fdskyt v\u00fdznamn\u00fdch hranic mezi geomorfologick\u00fdmi okrsky [28] v\u00a0povod\u00ed. Postup odvozen\u00ed: linie je hranice mezi geomorfologick\u00fdmi okrsky X a\u00a0Y; absolutn\u00ed hodnota rozd\u00edlu pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00e9 nadmo\u0159sk\u00e9 v\u00fd\u0161ky X a\u00a0pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00e9 nadmo\u0159sk\u00e9 v\u00fd\u0161ky Y d\u011blen\u00e1 stem je koeficient nadmo\u0159sk\u00e9 v\u00fd\u0161ky; absolutn\u00ed hodnota rozd\u00edlu pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00e9ho sklonu svahu X a\u00a0pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00e9ho sklonu svahu Y d\u011blen\u00e1 dv\u011bma je koeficient sklonu svahu; sou\u010dtem t\u011bchto dvou koeficient\u016f je d\u00e1n celkov\u00fd koeficient v\u00fd\u0161ky a\u00a0sklonu pro ka\u017edou hrani\u010dn\u00ed linii. Ka\u017ed\u00e9mu povod\u00ed je p\u0159i\u0159azena hodnota vypo\u010dten\u00e1 jako d\u00e9lka v\u0161ech lini\u00ed (hranic mezi geomorfologick\u00fdmi okrsky) proch\u00e1zej\u00edc\u00edch povod\u00edm, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e d\u00e9lka ka\u017ed\u00e9 linie byla vyn\u00e1sobena sv\u00fdm koeficientem. P\u0159evod na\u00a0\u0161k\u00e1lu 0\u20131 byl odvozen od\u00a0maxim\u00e1ln\u00ed hodnoty zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00e9 pro \u010cR.<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-8.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"479\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1192 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-8.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-8\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-8.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-8-300x180.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/479;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr.\u00a08. Mapa pod\u00edlu ploch vybran\u00fdch stojat\u00fdch vod v\u00a0povod\u00edch IV. \u0159\u00e1du; do\u00a0stojat\u00fdch vod nejsou zahrnuty velk\u00e9 vodn\u00ed n\u00e1dr\u017ee (se z\u00e1kladn\u00edm objemem v\u011bt\u0161\u00edm ne\u017e 2\u2008mil. m2), z\u00a0men\u0161\u00edch n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00ed jsou za\u0159azeny n\u00e1dr\u017ee s\u00a0rekrea\u010dn\u00edm, z\u00e1vlahov\u00fdm a\u00a0rybochovn\u00fdm \u00fa\u010delem, v\u010detn\u011b rybn\u00edk\u016f<br \/>\nFig. 8. Map of the share of stagnant water surfaces in the 4<sup>th<\/sup> order catchments; large reservoirs (with a\u00a0basic capacity of more than 2\u2008mil. cubic meters) are not included in the calculation; smaller reservoirs are included only if they serve for recreation, irrigation or fish farming, while fish\u00ad\u2011ponds are included all<\/h6>\n<p>V\u00fdskyt oblasti kras\u016f a\u00a0pseudokras\u016f, podchycuj\u00edc\u00ed oblasti s\u00a0krasov\u00fdm typem propustnosti, a\u00a0tedy specifick\u00fdm hydrologick\u00fdm re\u017eimem; mapa byla zalo\u017eena na\u00a0informac\u00edch AOPK (http:\/\/jeso.nature.cz\/) [29], (0 = \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 krasy \u010di pseudokrasy, 1 = 100\u00a0% plochy povod\u00ed tvo\u0159eno krasy nebo pseudokrasy).<\/p>\n<p>V\u00fdskyt v\u00fdznamn\u00fdch tektonick\u00fdch jev\u016f\u00a0\u2013 poruch, zlom\u016f v\u00a0povod\u00ed (http:\/\/www.geology.cz\/extranet\/mapy) byl hodnocen pro jednotliv\u00e1 povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du podle geologick\u00e9 mapy Geo\u010cR 500 tak, \u017ee bylo individu\u00e1ln\u011b posuzov\u00e1no, zda jde o\u00a0jev, kter\u00fd m\u016f\u017ee m\u00edt z\u0159eteln\u00fd vliv na\u00a0vodn\u00ed re\u017eim toku, nebo tento vliv nen\u00ed pravd\u011bpodobn\u00fd (nap\u0159.\u00a0kr\u00e1tk\u00fd zlom le\u017e\u00edc\u00ed v\u00a0okrajov\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti povod\u00ed nebyl d\u00e1le zva\u017eov\u00e1n), v\u00fdsledkem je bin\u00e1rn\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed (0\/1).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Vrstvy antropogenn\u00edch vliv\u016f<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Typ krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu (landuse): jednotky definovan\u00e9 podle manu\u00e1lu (http:\/\/www.eea.europa.eu\/publications\/tech40add) byly expertn\u011b spojeny do t\u0159\u00ed\u00a0skupin z\u00a0hlediska jejich o\u010dek\u00e1van\u00e9ho vlivu na\u00a0pr\u016ftoky hodnocen\u00fdch tok\u016f Hodnocen byl pod\u00edl typu 2 (0 = absence v\u00a0povod\u00ed, 1 = 100\u00a0% v\u00a0povod\u00ed) s\u00a0ohledem na\u00a0minoritn\u00ed pod\u00edl typu 1 a\u00a0z\u00a0toho plynouc\u00ed komplementarity typ\u016f 0 a\u00a02:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>typ 0\u00a0\u2013 \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd nebo nepatrn\u00fd negativn\u00ed vliv: t\u0159\u00edda 4 (humidn\u00ed \u00fazem\u00ed),<br \/>\n\u010d\u00e1st t\u0159\u00eddy 3\u00a0\u2013 3.1, 3.2, 321, 322, 324, tj.\u00a0p\u0159ev\u00e1\u017en\u011b lesy a\u00a0k\u0159oviny);<\/li>\n<li>typ 1\u00a0\u2013 m\u00edrn\u011b negativn\u00ed nebo nevyhran\u011bn\u00fd typ\u00a0\u2013 \u010d\u00e1sti t\u0159\u00edd 2<br \/>\n(2.2, 2.3, 221, 222, 231, 241, 243 a\u00a03.3 mimo v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00e9 v\u00a0typu 0);<\/li>\n<li>typ 2\u00a0\u2013 z\u0159eteln\u011b negativn\u00ed vliv (t\u0159\u00edda 1\u00a0\u2013 urbanizovan\u00e1 \u00fazem\u00ed,<br \/>\n\u010d\u00e1st t\u0159\u00eddy 2\u00a0\u2013 orn\u00e1 p\u016fda (2.1) a\u00a0komplexn\u00ed syst\u00e9my kultur a\u00a0parcel (242).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Pod\u00edl plochy stojat\u00fdch vod v\u00a0povod\u00ed: hodnoceno na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b dat z\u00a0datab\u00e1ze DIBAVOD [30] (www.dibavod.cz). Vylou\u010deny byly v\u0161echny n\u00e1dr\u017ee ozna\u010den\u00e9 jako vodn\u00ed n\u00e1dr\u017ee (v. n.) se z\u00e1kladn\u00edm objemem v\u011bt\u0161\u00edm ne\u017e 2\u2009000\u2009000\u2008m3 (co\u017e je jeden z\u00a0d\u016fle\u017eit\u00fdch parametr\u016f pro definici tzv.\u00a0mal\u00e9 vodn\u00ed n\u00e1dr\u017ee podle \u010cSN\u00a075\u20092410 [31]), z\u00a0vodn\u00edch n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00ed pod t\u00edmto limitem pak byly vylou\u010deny i\u00a0dal\u0161\u00ed, pokud nem\u011bly \u00fa\u010del rybochovn\u00fd, rekrea\u010dn\u00ed anebo z\u00e1vlahov\u00fd. N\u00e1dr\u017ee ozna\u010den\u00e9 jako rybn\u00edk byly v\u017edy ponech\u00e1ny. C\u00edlem bylo, aby ukazatel v\u00a0maxim\u00e1ln\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9 m\u00ed\u0159e postihoval vliv rybn\u00edk\u016f, resp. mal\u00fdch vodn\u00edch n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00ed. Hodnota 0 = povod\u00ed bez hodnocen\u00fdch n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00ed, 0,001 = 0,1\u00a0% plochy povod\u00ed tvo\u0159\u00ed stojat\u00e9 vody; tedy v\u00a0povod\u00ed o\u00a0100\u2008km2 se nach\u00e1z\u00ed 10 hektar\u016f vodn\u00edch ploch.<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-9.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1000\" height=\"586\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1193 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-9.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-9\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-9.jpg 1000w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-9-300x176.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 1000px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 1000\/586;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr.\u00a09. Klasifikace lokalit PER (toky st\u00e1le tekouc\u00ed), VUL (toky vysychaj\u00edc\u00ed nepravideln\u011b) a\u00a0INT (toky vysychaj\u00edc\u00ed pravideln\u011b) pomoc\u00ed abiotick\u00fdch charakteristik metodou klasifika\u010dn\u00edho stromu; N = po\u010det hodnocen\u00fdch lokalit, R_0 n\u00edzk\u00e9 riziko vysych\u00e1n\u00ed, R_1 st\u0159edn\u00ed riziko vysych\u00e1n\u00ed, R_2 velk\u00e9 riziko vysych\u00e1n\u00ed<br \/>\nFig. 9. The classification of sites as predicted by the classification tree; site\u2019s\u00a0classification PER, VUL, INT was predicted using abiotic characteristics; PER (permanent)\u00a0\u2013 sites with a\u00a0constant flow, VUL (vulnerable)\u00a0\u2013 sites with irregular drying up, INT (intermittent)\u00a0\u2013 sites with regular drying up, N = number of evaluated sites, R_0 low risk of drying up, R_1 medium risk of drying up, R_2 high risk of drying up<\/h6>\n<p>Pro v\u011bt\u0161inu lokalit (314) bylo mo\u017eno na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b \u00fadaj\u016f z\u00a0ter\u00e9nn\u00edch protokol\u016f, fotografick\u00e9 dokumentace a\u00a0mapov\u00fdch podklad\u016f odvodit zjednodu\u0161en\u00e9 hodnocen\u00ed m\u00edry ovlivn\u011bn\u00ed morfologie toku. Tato charakteristika byla pou\u017eita pro dopl\u0148kov\u00e9 hodnocen\u00ed, proto\u017ee nen\u00ed zpracovateln\u00e1 v\u00a0podob\u011b vrstvy GIS. Byly stanoveny t\u0159i typy:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>typ 0\u00a0\u2013 \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 nebo nepatrn\u00e9 negativn\u00ed ovlivn\u011bn\u00ed (p\u0159irozen\u00e9 koryto i\u00a0b\u0159eh, nanejv\u00fd\u0161e star\u00e9 sm\u011brov\u00e9 \u00fapravy a\u00a0fixace b\u0159eh\u016f stromy);<\/li>\n<li>typ 1\u00a0\u2013 st\u0159edn\u011b negativn\u00ed ovlivn\u011bn\u00ed (nap\u0159\u00edmen\u00e9 toky, obvykle s\u00a0pom\u00edstn\u011b opevn\u011bn\u00fdmi b\u0159ehy, s\u00a0b\u0159ehov\u00fdmi porosty strom\u016f a\u00a0ke\u0159\u016f);<\/li>\n<li>typ 2\u00a0\u2013 z\u0159eteln\u00e9 negativn\u00ed ovlivn\u011bn\u00ed (nap\u0159\u00edmen\u00e9 toky s\u00a0opevn\u011bn\u00fdmi b\u0159ehy a\u00a0\u010dasto i\u00a0dnem, bez souvisl\u00fdch b\u0159ehov\u00fdch porost\u016f.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>V\u00fdb\u011br a\u00a0kategorizace abiotick\u00fdch charakteristik \u00fazem\u00ed pro konstrukci mapy rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed<\/h3>\n<p>Byly vyb\u00edr\u00e1ny abiotick\u00e9 charakteristiky povod\u00ed podchytiteln\u00e9 ve\u00a0vrstv\u00e1ch GIS, jejich\u017e kombinace nejl\u00e9pe rozli\u0161ovaly \u00fazemn\u00ed jednotky z\u00a0hlediska v\u00fdskytu lokalit typu PER, VUL a\u00a0INT a\u00a0na\u00a0jejich\u017e z\u00e1klad\u011b lze \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR klasifikovat podle rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f do\u00a0t\u0159\u00ed kategori\u00ed: riziko mal\u00e9 (R_0), st\u0159edn\u00ed (R_1) a\u00a0velk\u00e9 (R_2).<\/p>\n<p>V\u00fdb\u011br charakteristik a\u00a0identifikace jejich hrani\u010dn\u00edch hodnot pro jednotliv\u00e9 \u00farovn\u011b d\u011blen\u00ed byl proveden pomoc\u00ed metody klasifika\u010dn\u00edch strom\u016f v\u00a0programu Statistica for Windows 12 [32]. Do\u00a0anal\u00fdzy vstupovalo sedm v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00fdch\u00a0abiotick\u00fdch charakteristik (mimo hodnocen\u00ed zm\u011bn morfologie tok\u016f) a\u00a0332 lokalit neovlivn\u011bn\u00fdch zne\u010di\u0161t\u011bn\u00edm nebo n\u00edzk\u00fdmi hodnotami pH, z\u00a0toho bylo 187 lokalit vyhodnoceno jako PER, 86 jako VUL a\u00a059 jako INT.<\/p>\n<h5>Tabulka 1. Z\u00e1kladn\u00ed charakteristiky 332 lokalit pou\u017eit\u00fdch pro anal\u00fdzy vedouc\u00ed ke\u00a0kategorizaci \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR z\u00a0hlediska rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f<br \/>\nTable 1. The basic characteristics of the 332 sites that were used in the analyses resulting in the categorization of the area of the Czech Republic in terms of the risk<br \/>\nof drying up of small streams<\/h5>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-tabulka-1.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"906\" height=\"166\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1200 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-tabulka-1.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-tabulka-1\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-tabulka-1.jpg 906w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-tabulka-1-300x55.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 906px) 100vw, 906px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 906px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 906\/166;\" \/><\/a>\n<p>V\u00a0anal\u00fdze byla nastavena krosvalidace a\u00a0bylo penalizov\u00e1no chybn\u00e9 p\u0159i\u0159azen\u00ed lokalit hodnocen\u00fdch podle bioindika\u010dn\u00ed metody jako VUL a\u00a0INT k\u00a0lokalit\u00e1m PER (tzv.\u00a0misclassification cost byla zv\u00fd\u0161ena na\u00a0dvojn\u00e1sobek a\u00a0\u010dty\u0159n\u00e1sobek). Byl tak\u00e9 nastaven dotaz na\u00a0existenci alternativn\u00edch charakteristik (surrogates) pro jednotliv\u00e9 \u00farovn\u011b d\u011blen\u00ed. \u00darove\u0148 klasifika\u010dn\u00edho stromu, tedy podrobnost d\u011blen\u00ed, byla vybr\u00e1na podle ozna\u010den\u00ed optim\u00e1ln\u00edho stromu ve\u00a0v\u00fdsledku anal\u00fdzy. V\u00fdsledky byly hodnoceny podle pod\u00edlu lokalit jednotliv\u00fdch typ\u016f (PER, VUL, INT) spr\u00e1vn\u011b za\u0159azen\u00fdch do\u00a0p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00fdch skupin a\u00a0celkov\u00e9 vysv\u011btlen\u00e9 variability v\u00a0datech. Koncov\u00e9 uzly klasifikace byly anal\u00fdzou ozna\u010deny podle nejpo\u010detn\u011bji zastoupen\u00e9ho typu lokality. Pr\u016fkaznost rozd\u00edl\u016f v\u00a0rozlo\u017een\u00ed hodnot charakteristik mezi skupinami lokalit byla testov\u00e1na pomoc\u00ed Kruskal\u00ad\u2011Wallisova testu.<\/p>\n<h3>Odvozen\u00ed stupn\u011b rizikovosti povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du z\u00a0hlediska vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f<\/h3>\n<p>Jednotliv\u00e1 povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du byla kategorizov\u00e1na pomoc\u00ed kombinace abiotick\u00fdch charakteristik a\u00a0jejich hrani\u010dn\u00edch hodnot ve\u00a0v\u00fdsledn\u00e9m klasifika\u010dn\u00edm stromu v\u00a0dan\u00e9 hierarchii. Bylo tedy postupov\u00e1no po\u00a0jednotliv\u00fdch v\u011btv\u00edch stromu podle hrani\u010dn\u00edch hodnot a\u00a0povod\u00ed bylo za\u0159azeno do\u00a0kategorie rizika podle p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00edc\u00edho typu lokalit v\u00a0koncov\u00e9m uzlu (R_0 pro p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00edc\u00ed PER, R_1 pro p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00edc\u00ed VUL a\u00a0R_2 pro p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00edc\u00ed INT). V\u00fdsledn\u00e1 kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed byla zobrazena v\u00a0map\u011b na\u00a0\u00farovni povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du. Byla t\u00e9\u017e vyhodnocena celkov\u00e1 homogenita jednotliv\u00fdch vodn\u00edch \u00fatvar\u016f (vymezen\u00fdch pro \u010cR pro pl\u00e1nov\u00e1n\u00ed v\u00a0oblasti vod) z\u00a0hlediska zastoupen\u00ed t\u0159\u00ed vyhodnocen\u00fdch typ\u016f rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed DVT pro ka\u017ed\u00fd \u00fatvar.<\/p>\n<h2>V\u00fdsledky<\/h2>\n<h3>Klasifikace lokalit<\/h3>\n<p>Celkem bylo na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b anal\u00fdz 1\u2009368 vzork\u016f makrozoobentosu hodnoceno 332 lokalit. Rozm\u00edst\u011bn\u00ed lokalit s\u00a0odb\u011brem makrozoobentosu je na<em>\u00a0obr.\u00a01<\/em> a\u00a0jejich z\u00e1kladn\u00ed charakteristiky v\u00a0<em>tabulce 1<\/em>. Hodnocen\u00e9 lokality jsou rozm\u00edst\u011bny v\u00edcem\u00e9n\u011b rovnom\u011brn\u011b po\u00a0\u00fazem\u00ed cel\u00e9ho st\u00e1tu s\u00a0v\u00fdjimkou oblast\u00ed nejn\u00ed\u017ee polo\u017een\u00fdch, kde byla zna\u010dn\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1st lokalit z\u00a0v\u00fdchoz\u00edho souboru IS SALAMANDER vylou\u010dena pro \u00fa\u010dely zde prezentovan\u00e9ho hodnocen\u00ed kv\u016fli zne\u010di\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed. Pomoc\u00ed bioindika\u010dn\u00ed metody bylo vyhodnoceno 187 lokalit jako PER (56,3\u00a0%), 86 jako VUL (25,9\u00a0%) a\u00a059 jako INT (17,8\u00a0%). Hodnoceny byly lokality na\u00a0toc\u00edch I. a\u017e V. \u0159\u00e1du podle Strahlera, naprostou v\u011bt\u0161inou v\u0161ak II. a\u017e IV. \u0159\u00e1du. Pod\u00edl lokalit INT na\u00a0toc\u00edch I. a\u017e III. \u0159\u00e1du se pohyboval kolem 20\u00a0% (18 a\u017e 23\u00a0%), na\u00a0toc\u00edch IV. \u0159\u00e1du pak m\u00e9n\u011b (12\u00a0%).<\/p>\n<p>Byly porovn\u00e1v\u00e1ny skupiny lokalit vyhran\u011bn\u00fdch v\u016f\u010di fenom\u00e9nu vysychavosti\u00a0\u2013 INT a\u00a0PER (Kruskal\u00ad\u2011Wallis test); nebyly zji\u0161t\u011bny pr\u016fkazn\u00e9 rozd\u00edly v\u00a0hodnot\u00e1ch \u0159\u00e1du toku, plochy povod\u00ed nad lokalitou, stejn\u011b ani u\u00a0v\u00fdskytu tektonick\u00fdch poruch v\u00a0povod\u00ed, v\u00fdskytu kras\u016f \u010di pseudokras\u016f v\u00a0povod\u00ed nebo v\u00fdznamn\u00fdch geomorfologick\u00fdch hranic. Pr\u016fkazn\u00fd rozd\u00edl mezi t\u011bmito skupinami lokalit naopak byl zji\u0161t\u011bn pro ukazatele deficitu sr\u00e1\u017eek (H = 45,33; p = 0,000)\u00a0\u2013 v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed deficit u\u00a0INT, pod\u00edlu j\u00edlovc\u016f (H = 27,33; p = 0,000)\u00a0\u2013 v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed pod\u00edl u\u00a0INT, typu krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu 2 (H = 56,33; p = 0,000)\u00a0\u2013 v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed pod\u00edl u\u00a0INT a\u00a0pod\u00edlu plochy stojat\u00fdch vod v\u00a0povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du (H = 14,66; p = 0,000)\u00a0\u2013 v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed pod\u00edl u\u00a0INT. Morfologick\u00fd stav lokalit INT byl prokazateln\u011b hor\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e lokalit PER (H = 66,19; p = 0,000).<\/p>\n<p>V\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b 36 lokalit byla dolo\u017eena epizoda vyschnut\u00ed p\u0159\u00edmo pozorov\u00e1n\u00edm\u00a0a\/nebo m\u011b\u0159en\u00edm pr\u016ftoku v\u00a0pr\u016fb\u011bhu ter\u00e9nn\u00edch prac\u00ed. Z\u00a0t\u011bchto lokalit bylo hodnoceno pomoc\u00ed bioindika\u010dn\u00ed metody 47,2\u00a0% jako INT, 50\u00a0% jako VUL a\u00a02,8\u00a0% (tedy pouze jedna lokalita) jako PER. Vypl\u00fdv\u00e1 z\u00a0toho, \u017ee pou\u017eit\u00e1 metoda retrospektivn\u00ed bioindikace vysych\u00e1n\u00ed toku na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b makrozoobentosu m\u011bla ve\u00a0srovn\u00e1n\u00ed s\u00a0re\u00e1ln\u00fdm v\u00fdskytem vyschnut\u00ed vysokou \u00fasp\u011b\u0161nost detekce vyschnut\u00ed.<\/p>\n<h3>Abiotick\u00e9 charakteristiky pro kategorizaci \u00fazem\u00ed<\/h3>\n<p>Kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed byly zpracov\u00e1ny a\u00a0hodnoceny na\u00a0\u00farovni povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du. Pro porovn\u00e1n\u00ed rozlo\u017een\u00ed charakteristiky pro celou republiku a\u00a0v\u00a0hodnocen\u00e9m souboru lokalit je u\u00a0v\u00fdsledk\u016f ka\u017ed\u00e9 charakteristiky nejprve komentov\u00e1n stav pro celou \u010cR a\u00a0vz\u00e1p\u011bt\u00ed pouze pro povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du, v\u00a0nich\u017e se nal\u00e9zaj\u00ed hodnocen\u00e9 lokality.<\/p>\n<p>Pro pot\u0159eby kategorizace \u010cR z\u00a0hlediska ohro\u017een\u00ed deficitem sr\u00e1\u017eek byla vytvo\u0159ena mapa, na\u00a0n\u00ed\u017e je \u00fazem\u00ed rozd\u011bleno podle deficitu sr\u00e1\u017eek (p\u0159evl\u00e1daj\u00edc\u00ed evapotranspirace nad sr\u00e1\u017ekami vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00e9 pomoc\u00ed jednotliv\u00fdch kvantil\u016f) do\u00a0deseti kategori\u00ed podle \u010detnosti jednotliv\u00fdch let, v\u00a0nich\u017e p\u0159evl\u00e1d\u00e1 evapotranspirace nad sr\u00e1\u017ekami. Na\u00a0<em>obr.\u00a02<\/em> je zobrazena v\u00fdsledn\u00e1 kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed, kde oblast tmav\u011b \u010derven\u00e1 (0,9 a\u017e 1,0) p\u0159edstavuje \u00fazem\u00ed, kde ve\u00a0v\u00edce ne\u017e 90\u00a0% jednotliv\u00fdch let hodnocen\u00e9ho obdob\u00ed 1961\u20132011 p\u0159evl\u00e1dala evapotranspirace nad sr\u00e1\u017ekami, naopak v\u00a0oblastech s\u00a0tmav\u011b zelenou barvou (0\u20130,1) bu\u010f p\u0159evl\u00e1daj\u00ed sr\u00e1\u017eky ve\u00a0v\u0161ech letech, pop\u0159.\u00a0evapotranspirace p\u0159evl\u00e1d\u00e1 nad sr\u00e1\u017ekami maxim\u00e1ln\u011b do\u00a010\u00a0% p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f, tzn.\u00a0jen v\u00a0nejsu\u0161\u0161\u00edch letech.<\/p>\n<p>V\u00a0r\u00e1mci \u010cR n\u00e1le\u017eela zhruba t\u0159etina (35\u00a0%) z\u00a0celkov\u00e9ho po\u010dtu povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du do\u00a0oblasti s\u00a0nejp\u0159\u00edzniv\u011bj\u0161\u00edmi klimatick\u00fdmi podm\u00ednkami (&lt; 0,2). Do\u00a0oblast\u00ed, kde jsou \u010dast\u011bj\u0161\u00ed roky s\u00a0p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00edc\u00ed evapotranspirac\u00ed (&gt; 0,5), spadala tak\u00e9 t\u0159etina (33\u00a0%) hodnocen\u00fdch povod\u00ed. Hodnocen\u00e9 lokality se v\u00a0povod\u00edch s\u00a0nejp\u0159\u00edzniv\u011bj\u0161\u00edmi klimatick\u00fdmi podm\u00ednkami (&lt; 0,2) vyskytovaly ve\u00a047\u00a0% p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f, pon\u011bkud m\u00e9n\u011b se vyskytovaly v\u00a0povod\u00edch s\u00a0vy\u0161\u0161\u00edm deficitem sr\u00e1\u017eek (23\u00a0%).<\/p>\n<p>V\u00fdskyt j\u00edlovc\u016f v\u00a0podlo\u017e\u00ed je geograficky vymezen, vyskytuj\u00ed se p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm v\u00a0povod\u00ed Labe v\u00a0oblasti \u010cesk\u00e9 tabule a\u00a0jiho\u010desk\u00fdch p\u00e1nv\u00ed (<em>obr.\u00a03<\/em>). Nevyskytuj\u00ed se v\u00a072\u00a0% povod\u00ed v\u00a0\u010cR, ve\u00a014\u00a0% je pak jejich pod\u00edl nadpolovi\u010dn\u00ed. Pro hodnocen\u00e9 lokality byl nadpolovi\u010dn\u00ed pod\u00edl j\u00edlovc\u016f zji\u0161t\u011bn ve\u00a020\u00a0% povod\u00ed a\u00a0zhruba dv\u011b t\u0159etiny z\u00a0nich (67,5\u00a0%) p\u0159\u00edtomnost j\u00edlovc\u016f nevykazuj\u00ed, co\u017e se bl\u00ed\u017e\u00ed situaci v\u00a0cel\u00e9 \u010cR.<\/p>\n<p>V\u00fdskyt v\u00fdznamn\u00fdch hranic mezi geomorfologick\u00fdmi okrsky v\u00a0povod\u00ed (<em>obr.\u00a04<\/em>) nebyl zji\u0161t\u011bn ve\u00a0v\u00edce ne\u017e \u010dtvrtin\u011b povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du (29\u00a0%), v\u00a0dal\u0161\u00ed \u010dtvrtin\u011b (26\u00a0%) povod\u00ed byla zji\u0161t\u011bna hodnota v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e 0,25. Mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u011b vysok\u00e9 hodnoty\u00a0(&gt; 0,50) se t\u00fdkaly necel\u00fdch 2\u00a0% povod\u00ed. Pro hodnocen\u00e9 lokality bylo v\u00a0uveden\u00fdch kategori\u00edch zji\u0161t\u011bno zastoupen\u00ed 17\u00a0%, 41\u00a0% a\u00a08\u00a0%, lokality se tedy \u010dast\u011bji vyskytovaly v\u00a0povod\u00edch s\u00a0vy\u0161\u0161\u00edmi hodnotami t\u00e9to charakteristiky, ne\u017e odpov\u00eddalo rozlo\u017een\u00ed v\u00a0r\u00e1mci republiky.<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-10.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"483\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1194 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-10.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-10\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-10.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-10-300x181.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/483;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr.\u00a010. Mapa pod\u00edlu nep\u0159\u00edzniv\u00e9ho druhu povrchu kategorie 2 v\u00a0povod\u00edch IV. \u0159\u00e1du; zobrazuje hodnoty hrani\u010dn\u00ed pro kategorizaci \u00fazem\u00ed (obr.\u00a09)<br \/>\nFig. 10. Map of the share of adverse type of land cover (artificial areas, arable land, complex cultivation patterns after CORINE) in the 4th order catchments; borderline values used in the classification tree are displayed (fig. 9)<\/h6>\n<p>V\u00fdskyt krasov\u00fdch a\u00a0pseudokrasov\u00fdch oblast\u00ed (<em>obr.\u00a05<\/em>) nebyl zji\u0161t\u011bn u\u00a069\u00a0% povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du v\u00a0\u010cR, nadpolovi\u010dn\u00ed pod\u00edl se vyskytoval u\u00a018\u00a0% povod\u00ed v\u00a0r\u016fzn\u00fdch \u010d\u00e1stech republiky. Hodnocen\u00e9 lokality se vyskytuj\u00ed v\u00a0povod\u00edch bez krasov\u00fdch nebo pseudokrasov\u00fdch jev\u016f v\u00a059\u00a0% p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f, nadpolovi\u010dn\u00ed pod\u00edl byl zji\u0161t\u011bn v\u00a015\u00a0% p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f, zastoupen\u00ed je tedy p\u0159ibli\u017en\u011b srovnateln\u00e9 se situac\u00ed v\u00a0\u010cR.<\/p>\n<p>V\u00fdskyt v\u00fdznamn\u00fdch tektonick\u00fdch jev\u016f (poruch, zlom\u016f v\u00a0povod\u00ed) byl na\u00a0\u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR detekov\u00e1n ve\u00a0t\u0159etin\u011b povod\u00ed (34,6\u00a0%), v\u00edce v\u00a0povod\u00ed Moravy a\u00a0Odry, zejm\u00e9na v\u00a0oblasti Jesen\u00edk\u016f a\u00a0Beskyd (<em>obr.\u00a06<\/em>). Tyto jevy byly zji\u0161t\u011bny v\u00a0povod\u00edch hodnocen\u00fdch lokalit ve\u00a049\u00a0% p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f, tedy \u010dast\u011bji ne\u017e odpov\u00eddalo situaci na\u00a0cel\u00e9m \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR.<\/p>\n<p>Typ nep\u0159\u00edzniv\u00e9ho krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu (2) se podle o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed vyskytoval v\u00a0\u010cR p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm v\u00a0oblastech n\u00ed\u017ein (<em>obr.\u00a07<\/em>). Nadpolovi\u010dn\u00ed pod\u00edl tohoto typu byl zji\u0161t\u011bn pro 45\u00a0% povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du a\u00a034\u00a0% povod\u00ed hodnocen\u00fdch lokalit. D\u016fvodem ni\u017e\u0161\u00edho zastoupen\u00ed hodnocen\u00fdch lokalit v\u00a0povod\u00edch s\u00a0m\u00e9n\u011b p\u0159\u00edzniv\u00fdm krajinn\u00fdm pokryvem bylo to, \u017ee lokality zde se vyskytuj\u00edc\u00ed nebyly vhodn\u00e9 pro za\u0159azen\u00ed do\u00a0analyzovan\u00e9ho souboru kv\u016fli sv\u00e9mu zne\u010di\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed.<\/p>\n<p>Z\u00a0hlediska pod\u00edlu ploch uva\u017eovan\u00fdch stojat\u00fdch vod (<em>obr.\u00a08<\/em>), tedy zejm\u00e9na mal\u00fdch vodn\u00edch n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00ed v\u010detn\u011b rybn\u00edk\u016f, bylo zji\u0161t\u011bno, \u017ee se v\u00a0\u010cR nevyskytuj\u00ed v\u00a019,2\u00a0% povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du (t\u00fdk\u00e1 se v\u011bt\u0161inou horsk\u00fdch oblast\u00ed). V\u00a0necel\u00e9 t\u0159etin\u011b\u00a0(30\u00a0%) povod\u00ed tvo\u0159\u00ed stojat\u00e9 vody maxim\u00e1ln\u011b 0,001\u00a0% plochy. Zhruba 14\u00a0% povod\u00ed m\u00e1 zastoupen\u00ed ploch stojat\u00fdch vod vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e 0,01\u00a0%. Hodnocen\u00e9 lokality se ve\u00a020\u00a0% p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f nach\u00e1zely v\u00a0povod\u00edch bez uva\u017eovan\u00fdch stojat\u00fdch vod, \u010dast\u011bji (40\u00a0% p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f) byly v\u00a0povod\u00edch s\u00a0jejich pod\u00edlem do\u00a00,001\u00a0%, m\u00e1lo (7,5\u00a0%) byly zastoupen\u00e9 v\u00a0kategorii nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed, kde pod\u00edl ploch stojat\u00fdch vod je v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e 0,01\u00a0%.<\/p>\n<h2>Klasifikace lokalit jako podklad pro kategorizaci \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR<\/h2>\n<p>Lokality zat\u0159\u00edd\u011bn\u00e9 do\u00a0kategori\u00ed INT, VUL a\u00a0PER byly vyhodnoceny pomoc\u00ed klasifika\u010dn\u00edho stromu na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b vybran\u00fdch charakteristik prost\u0159ed\u00ed. Koncov\u00e9 uzly klasifikace pak byly ozna\u010deny podle p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00edc\u00edho typu za\u0159azen\u00fdch lokalit: mal\u00e9 riziko vysych\u00e1n\u00ed R_0 pro lokality PER, st\u0159edn\u00ed riziko R_1 pro lokality VUL a\u00a0velk\u00e9 riziko R_2 pro lokality INT). V\u00fdsledn\u00fd klasifika\u010dn\u00ed strom viz\u00a0<em>obr.\u00a09<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Pom\u011br spr\u00e1vn\u011b klasifikovan\u00fdch lokalit byl v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b lokalit na\u00a0obou p\u00f3lech gradientu vysychavosti (tj.\u00a0PER a\u00a0INT) pom\u011brn\u011b vysok\u00fd (81\u00a0% lokalit PER a\u00a078\u00a0% lokalit INT). Lokality k\u00a0vysych\u00e1n\u00ed vyhran\u011bn\u00e9 m\u00e9n\u011b (VUL) se v\u0161ak do\u00a0p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e9 kategorie \u0159adily pouze v\u00a038\u00a0% p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f. Men\u0161\u00ed p\u0159esnost hodnocen\u00ed lokalit typu VUL pak ovlivnila ni\u017e\u0161\u00ed procento celkov\u00e9 vysv\u011btlen\u00e9 variability v\u00a0datech (62,8\u00a0%). Ni\u017e\u0161\u00ed spolehlivost klasifikace u\u00a0st\u0159edn\u00ed kategorie je vcelku logick\u00e1, nebo\u0165 se jedn\u00e1\u00a0o p\u0159echodn\u00fd typ mezi dv\u011bma extr\u00e9my (permanentn\u00ed a\u00a0intermitentn\u00ed toky), kter\u00fd se v\u00a0r\u016fzn\u00fdch sezon\u00e1ch m\u016f\u017ee chovat rozd\u00edln\u011b v\u00a0z\u00e1vislosti na\u00a0klimatick\u00fdch pom\u011brech.<\/p>\n<p>P\u0159i v\u00fdsledn\u00e9 klasifikaci se uplatnily n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed charakteristiky povod\u00ed: krajinn\u00fd pokryv, deficit sr\u00e1\u017eek, pod\u00edl stojat\u00fdch vod, pod\u00edl j\u00edlovc\u016f a\u00a0v\u00fdskyt v\u00fdznamn\u00e9 geomorfologick\u00e9 hranice. Dv\u011b z\u00a0charakteristik vstupuj\u00edc\u00edch do\u00a0anal\u00fdzy (pod\u00edl kras\u016f a\u00a0pseudokras\u016f a\u00a0v\u00fdskyt v\u00fdznamn\u00fdch tektonick\u00fdch poruch) vykazovaly n\u00edzkou importanci a\u00a0ve\u00a0v\u00fdsledn\u00e9 klasifikaci se neprojevily jako prom\u011bnn\u00e9 vysv\u011btluj\u00edc\u00ed v\u00fdraznou \u010d\u00e1st variability. Rozlo\u017een\u00ed charakteristik na\u00a0\u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR podle hrani\u010dn\u00edch hodnot klasifikace je z\u0159ejm\u00e9 z\u00a0<em>obr.\u00a010\u201314<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Hlavn\u00ed charakteristikou prost\u0159ed\u00ed (na\u00a0\u00farovni z\u00e1kladn\u00edho d\u011blen\u00ed), za\u00a0kterou nebyla v\u00a0anal\u00fdze uvedena z\u00e1stupn\u00e1 charakteristika, byl typ krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu, respektive pod\u00edl n\u00e1mi definovan\u00e9 kategorie 2 v\u00a0povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du.<\/p>\n<p>Pokud pod\u00edl p\u016fdn\u00edho pokryvu typu 2 (s\u00a0dominantn\u00edm pod\u00edlem orn\u00e9 p\u016fdy) nebyl v\u00fdrazn\u011bji p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00edc\u00ed (\u2264 0,568, <em>obr.\u00a01<\/em>0, tj.\u00a0lev\u00e1 strana stromu), jevil se jako v\u00fdznamn\u00e1 charakteristika povod\u00ed deficit sr\u00e1\u017eek (hrani\u010dn\u00ed hodnota 0,195), p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e alternativou pro deficit sr\u00e1\u017eek je pod\u00edl typu 2 krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu s\u00a0hrani\u010dn\u00ed hodnotou 0,220. N\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed\u00ad\u00ad\u2011li povod\u00ed do\u00a0t\u00e9to klimaticky nejp\u0159\u00edzniv\u011bj\u0161\u00ed oblasti<br \/>\n(\u2264 0,195, <em>obr.\u00a011<\/em>), naprosto p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00ed lokality PER (121 ze 142 v\u00a0tomto koncov\u00e9m uzlu \u010d.\u00a01). Znamen\u00e1 to, \u017ee dv\u011b t\u0159etiny v\u0161ech lokalit vyhodnocen\u00fdch jako PER jsou za\u0159azeny do\u00a0t\u00e9to v\u011btve klasifikace, p\u0159ev\u00e1\u017en\u011b se jedn\u00e1 o\u00a0lokality ve\u00a0vy\u0161\u0161\u00edch poloh\u00e1ch (cf. <em>obr.\u00a01<\/em>). Koncov\u00fd uzel \u010d.\u00a01 reprezentuje mal\u00e9 riziko R_0. Do\u00a0t\u00e9to skupiny v\u0161ak byly za\u0159azeny tak\u00e9 n\u011bkter\u00e9 lokality INT se specifick\u00fdm charakterem, nap\u0159\u00edklad potok Oblou\u010dn\u00edk (p\u0159\u00edtok Vidn\u00e1vky) pobl\u00ed\u017e obce V\u00e1penn\u00e1 v\u00a0Jesen\u00edk\u00e1ch, kter\u00fd le\u017e\u00ed v\u00a0krasov\u00e9m \u00fazem\u00ed, ovliv\u0148uj\u00edc\u00edm jeho hydrologick\u00fd re\u017eim.<\/p>\n<p>Pro levou stranu stromu d\u00e1le plat\u00ed, \u017ee v\u00a0povod\u00edch, je\u017e spadaj\u00ed do\u00a0oblast\u00ed, v\u00a0nich\u017e byl deficit sr\u00e1\u017eek ji\u017e \u010dast\u011bj\u0161\u00ed (&gt; 0,195), jevil se v\u00fdznamn\u00fdm pod\u00edl j\u00edlovc\u016f v\u00a0podlo\u017e\u00ed (<em>obr.\u00a012<\/em>). Pokud tento p\u0159esahoval hodnotu 0,610, v\u00a0koncov\u00e9m uzlu \u010d.\u00a02 p\u0159eva\u017eovaly lokality INT (11 ze 17) a\u00a0riziko je hodnoceno jako velk\u00e9 (R_2). P\u0159\u00edkladem m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt O\u010dihoveck\u00fd potok (p\u0159\u00edtok Bl\u0161anky) u\u00a0obce Strojetice na\u00a0Rakovnicku. Pokud byl deficit sr\u00e1\u017eek \u010dast\u011bj\u0161\u00ed (&gt; 0,195), ale pod\u00edl j\u00edlovc\u016f ni\u017e\u0161\u00ed (\u2264 0,610), odd\u011blilo se n\u011bkolik lokalit v\u00a0povod\u00edch s\u00a0v\u00fdznamnou geomorfologickou hranic\u00ed (&gt; 0,470, <em>obr.\u00a013<\/em>) do\u00a0koncov\u00e9ho uzlu \u010d.\u00a03, kter\u00fd reprezentoval velk\u00e9 riziko (R_2). Do\u00a0tohoto uzlu n\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed nap\u0159.\u00a0lokalita na\u00a0potoce Rakovec pobl\u00ed\u017e obce Bukovinka na\u00a0pomez\u00ed Moravsk\u00e9ho krasu a\u00a0Drahansk\u00e9 vrchoviny, na\u00a0n\u00ed\u017e vysych\u00e1 \u00fasek v\u00a0d\u00e9lce n\u011bkolika km pr\u00e1v\u011b v\u00a0oblasti t\u00e9to hranice.<\/p>\n<p>Ve\u00a0zb\u00fdvaj\u00edc\u00ed \u010d\u00e1sti t\u00e9to lev\u00e9 v\u011btve klasifika\u010dn\u00edho stromu z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1 79 lokalit, kter\u00e9 se pak d\u011bl\u00ed podle deficitu sr\u00e1\u017eek (hrani\u010dn\u00ed hodnota 0,450) na\u00a0t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 stejn\u011b po\u010detn\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti (41 a\u00a038 lokalit), p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e v\u00a0oblastech s\u00a0ni\u017e\u0161\u00edmi sr\u00e1\u017ekov\u00fdmi deficity p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00ed lokality PER a\u00a0tento uzel \u010d.\u00a04 reprezentuje mal\u00e9 riziko (R_0). P\u0159\u00edkladem mohou b\u00fdt nap\u0159.\u00a0permanentn\u00ed toky Ohrozima pobl\u00ed\u017e obce Hrabyn\u011b v\u00a0povod\u00ed Opavy nebo Pa\u0161\u00ednovick\u00fd potok nad obc\u00ed Pa\u0161\u00ednovice v\u00a0povod\u00ed Stropnice, oba v\u00a0zalesn\u011bn\u00fdch povod\u00edch bez n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00ed. Uzel \u010d.\u00a05\u2008s\u00a0vy\u0161\u0161\u00edmi deficity sr\u00e1\u017eek a\u00a0s\u00a0vy\u0161\u0161\u00edm po\u010dtem lokalit VUL pak p\u0159edstavuje riziko st\u0159edn\u00ed (R_1). Do\u00a0t\u00e9to skupiny lokalit pat\u0159\u00ed nap\u0159.\u00a0Podhr\u00e1zsk\u00fd potok u\u00a0obce Zdemyslice (p\u0159\u00edtok \u00daslavy), v\u00a0jeho\u017e povod\u00ed je nadpolovi\u010dn\u00ed pod\u00edl nep\u0159\u00edzniv\u00e9ho krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu (0,560), co\u017e je hodnota, kter\u00e1 se bl\u00ed\u017e\u00ed hodnot\u011b z\u00e1kladn\u00edho d\u011blen\u00ed.<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-11.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"483\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1195 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-11.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-11\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-11.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-11-300x181.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/483;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr.\u00a011. Mapa deficitu sr\u00e1\u017eek v\u00a0povod\u00edch IV. \u0159\u00e1du; zobrazuje hodnoty hrani\u010dn\u00ed pro kategorizaci \u00fazem\u00ed (obr.\u00a09)<br \/>\nFig.\u200911. Map of the rainfall deficit; for explanation see fig. 2.; borderline values used in the classification tree are displayed (fig. 9)<\/h6>\n<p>Na\u00a0prav\u00e9 stran\u011b z\u00e1kladn\u00edho d\u011blen\u00ed klasifika\u010dn\u00edho stromu v\u00a0povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du p\u0159eva\u017eovala (&gt; 0,568) v\u00a0plo\u0161e povod\u00ed orn\u00e1 p\u016fda, pop\u0159\u00edpad\u011b urbanizovan\u00e9 \u00fazem\u00ed anebo komplexn\u00ed syst\u00e9my pozemk\u016f a\u00a0parcel. V\u00a0koncov\u00fdch uzlech t\u00e9to prav\u00e9 strany stromu se nach\u00e1zely v\u011btve s\u00a0p\u0159evahou lokalit typu VUL a\u00a0INT. Dal\u0161\u00ed charakteristikou v\u00a0t\u00e9to v\u011btvi d\u011blen\u00ed byl pod\u00edl ploch stojat\u00fdch vod v\u00a0povod\u00ed (<em>obr.\u00a014<\/em>). Pokud byl pod\u00edl t\u011bchto ploch men\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e 0,001 (uzel \u010d.\u00a06), p\u0159eva\u017eovaly lokality VUL a\u00a0uzel reprezentoval riziko st\u0159edn\u00ed (R_1), p\u0159\u00edkladem m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt lokalita na\u00a0Sloupnick\u00e9m potoce (p\u0159\u00edtok Lou\u010dn\u00e9) pod obc\u00ed Tisov\u00e1. V\u00a0tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b se jedn\u00e1 o\u00a0v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed tok a\u00a0ve\u00a0vy\u0161\u0161\u00edch \u010d\u00e1stech jeho povod\u00ed je rybni\u010dn\u00ed soustava.<\/p>\n<p>Pokud byl pod\u00edl ploch stojat\u00fdch vod v\u00a0povod\u00ed vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed (\u2265 0,001, tedy 1\u00a0\u2030), byla ji\u017e polovina lokalit (31 z\u00a061) \u0159azen\u00fdch do\u00a0tohoto koncov\u00e9ho uzlu \u010d.\u00a07 ozna\u010dena jako INT, lokalit VUL bylo 18. Tento koncov\u00fd uzel reprezentoval riziko velk\u00e9 (R_2). Nepat\u0159ily sem v\u0161ak pouze lokality v\u00a0povod\u00edch v\u00a0n\u00ed\u017ein\u00e1ch a\u00a0s\u00a0velk\u00fdm deficitem sr\u00e1\u017eek, jak by se dalo p\u0159edpokl\u00e1dat, ale i\u00a0lokality na\u00a0toc\u00edch v\u00a0nadmo\u0159sk\u00fdch v\u00fd\u0161k\u00e1ch bl\u00ed\u017e\u00edc\u00edch se 500\u00a0m\u00a0n.\u00a0m., v\u00a0oblastech chladn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch a\u00a0bez v\u00fdrazn\u00fdch sr\u00e1\u017ekov\u00fdch deficit\u016f, jako je nap\u0159.\u00a0Dobersk\u00fd potok (p\u0159\u00edtok S\u00e1zavy) u\u00a0P\u0159ibyslavi.<\/p>\n<h3>Kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR podle rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f<\/h3>\n<p>Kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed byla provedena pro 8\u2009286 povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du (cel\u00e1 \u010cR) postupem uveden\u00fdm v\u00a0metodice. Bylo tedy postupov\u00e1no po\u00a0jednotliv\u00fdch v\u011btv\u00edch klasifika\u010dn\u00edho stromu a\u00a0podle kombinac\u00ed hrani\u010dn\u00edch hodnot charakteristik prost\u0159ed\u00ed bylo ka\u017ed\u00e9 povod\u00ed za\u0159azeno do\u00a0kategorie rizika stanoven\u00e9ho pro koncov\u00fd uzel klasifikace. Riziko bylo odvozeno podle p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00edc\u00edho typu lokalit (R_0 pro PER, R_1 pro VUL a\u00a0R_2 pro INT).<\/p>\n<p>V\u00fdsledn\u00e1 klasifikace \u00fazem\u00ed je zobrazena v\u00a0map\u011b na\u00a0\u00farovni povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du (<em>obr.\u00a015<\/em>). Podle t\u00e9to kategorizace je 44,5\u00a0% z\u00a0celkov\u00e9ho po\u010dtu povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du hodnoceno jako \u00fazem\u00ed s\u00a0mal\u00fdm rizikem vysych\u00e1n\u00ed DVT (R_0), pro 29,4\u00a0% povod\u00ed bylo stanoveno riziko st\u0159edn\u00ed (R_1). Zb\u00fdvaj\u00edc\u00edch 26,1\u00a0% je pak ozna\u010deno jako \u00fazem\u00ed s\u00a0rizikem velk\u00fdm (R_2). Z\u00a0hlediska plochy to pak p\u0159edstavuje 45,3 %, 23,3 % a\u00a031,3\u00a0% rozlohy \u010cR.<\/p>\n<p>Byla t\u00e9\u017e vyhodnocena homogenita vodn\u00edch \u00fatvar\u016f povrchov\u00fdch vod tekouc\u00edch z\u00a0hlediska rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed DVT. P\u0159ibli\u017en\u011b polovina (53,4\u00a0%) vodn\u00edch \u00fatvar\u016f m\u00e1 jednozna\u010dn\u00e9 za\u0159azen\u00ed do\u00a0kategorie rizika, je v\u0161ak t\u0159eba uv\u00e9st, \u017ee t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 t\u0159etina vodn\u00edch \u00fatvar\u016f je tvo\u0159ena jen jedn\u00edm povod\u00edm IV. \u0159\u00e1du. Z\u00a0t\u011bchto jednozna\u010dn\u011b kategorizovan\u00fdch vodn\u00edch \u00fatvar\u016f bylo 42,9\u00a0% z\u00a0celkov\u00e9ho po\u010dtu vodn\u00edch \u00fatvar\u016f v\u00a0kategorii R_0, 7\u00a0% v\u00a0R_1 a\u00a03,5\u00a0% v\u00a0R_2. Zb\u00fdvaj\u00edc\u00ed \u00fatvary pak byly tvo\u0159eny povod\u00edmi, klasifikovan\u00fdmi do\u00a0dvou nebo do\u00a0v\u0161ech t\u0159\u00ed kategori\u00ed rizika (cca\u00a028 % a\u00a018\u00a0%).<\/p>\n<h2>Diskuse<\/h2>\n<p>Kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR byla zalo\u017eena na\u00a0anal\u00fdze vstupn\u00edho souboru dat o\u00a0biotick\u00e9 slo\u017ece tok\u016f\u00a0\u2013 makrozoobentosu. Tato skupina organism\u016f je pova\u017eov\u00e1na za\u00a0vhodnou pro indikaci r\u016fzn\u00fdch typ\u016f vliv\u016f v\u00a0toc\u00edch [1, 33]. Nov\u011b vyvinut\u00e1 metoda retrospektivn\u00ed indikace vykazovala p\u0159i pou\u017eit\u00ed na\u00a0souboru dat z\u00a0projektu BIOSUCHO spolehlivost t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 90\u00a0% spr\u00e1vn\u00e9 klasifikace p\u0159i za\u0159azen\u00ed vzork\u016f do\u00a0kategori\u00ed permanentn\u00ed (PER) nebo vysychav\u00fd (INT) tok. P\u0159i za\u0159azen\u00ed do\u00a0p\u0159echodn\u00e9 kategorie vysych\u00e1n\u00edm zraniteln\u00fd tok (VUL) pak cca\u00a070\u00a0% [34], p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e u\u00a0v\u0161ech hodnocen\u00fdch odb\u011br\u016f bylo mo\u017en\u00e9 ov\u011b\u0159it rozsah a\u00a0trv\u00e1n\u00ed epizody vyschnut\u00ed exaktn\u011b m\u011b\u0159en\u00fdmi daty z\u00a0ter\u00e9nu. Spolehlivost detekce vyschnut\u00ed tok\u016f pomoc\u00ed t\u00e9to bioindika\u010dn\u00ed metody je tedy vysok\u00e1.<\/p>\n<p>Soubor dat z\u00a0IS SALAMANDER nebyl p\u016fvodn\u011b ur\u010den pro hodnocen\u00ed frekvence vysych\u00e1n\u00ed a\u00a0p\u0159esn\u011b zm\u011b\u0159en\u00e1 a\u00a0soustavn\u00e1 data o\u00a0d\u00e9lce trv\u00e1n\u00ed a\u00a0rozsahu vyschnut\u00ed nejsou pro tuto datab\u00e1zi k\u00a0dispozici. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b se jedn\u00e1 o\u00a0unik\u00e1tn\u00ed soubor v\u00fdsledk\u016f anal\u00fdz, m\u011b\u0159en\u00ed a\u00a0pozorov\u00e1n\u00ed na\u00a0velk\u00e9m po\u010dtu lokalit v\u00a0obdob\u00ed druh\u00e9 poloviny 90. let 20. stolet\u00ed (v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b v\u011bt\u0161iny minim\u00e1ln\u011b ovlivn\u011bn\u00fdch lokalit) a\u00a0s\u00a0p\u0159ev\u00e1\u017en\u011b v\u00edcelet\u00fdm sledov\u00e1n\u00edm dal\u0161\u00edch lokalit b\u011bhem prvn\u00ed dek\u00e1dy tohoto stolet\u00ed. Jedn\u00e1 se tedy o\u00a0obdob\u00ed, kdy se ji\u017e za\u010daly v\u00fdrazn\u011bji projevovat klimatick\u00e9 zm\u011bny. Hodnocen\u00ed vzork\u016f makrozoobentosu z\u00a0odb\u011br\u016f proveden\u00fdch ZVHS bylo mo\u017eno ov\u011b\u0159ovat pomoc\u00ed srovn\u00e1n\u00ed se z\u00e1znamy o\u00a0re\u00e1ln\u00e9m pr\u016ftoku od\u00a0vzorka\u0159\u016f, kte\u0159\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161inu lokalit nav\u0161t\u011bvovali v\u00a0m\u011bs\u00ed\u010dn\u00edch intervalech. Pozorovan\u00e9 epizody vyschnut\u00ed tedy nemusely b\u00fdt zaznamen\u00e1ny v\u017edy, pokud \u0161lo o\u00a0epizody krat\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e m\u011bs\u00edc, tedy v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b vzork\u016f, kter\u00e9 pot\u00e9 byly pravd\u011bpodobn\u011b vyhodnoceny jako VUL. Detekce krat\u0161\u00edch epizod vyschnut\u00ed pomoc\u00ed bioindikace je tak\u00e9 pon\u011bkud obt\u00ed\u017en\u011bj\u0161\u00ed, proto byl p\u0159evod hodnocen\u00ed jednotliv\u00fdch vzork\u016f na\u00a0hodnocen\u00ed lokalit nastaven s\u00a0ur\u010ditou obez\u0159etnost\u00ed ve\u00a0smyslu eliminace fale\u0161n\u011b pozitivn\u00edch v\u00fdsledk\u016f (tj.\u00a0indikace vyschnut\u00ed, kter\u00e9 v\u0161ak ve\u00a0skute\u010dnosti nenastalo). Jako VUL byla lokalita hodnocena, jestli\u017ee tento stav byl detekov\u00e1n nejm\u00e9n\u011b u\u00a0dvou vzork\u016f (tj.\u00a0sezon) za\u00a0obdob\u00ed sledov\u00e1n\u00ed (pop\u0159.\u00a0byl jednor\u00e1zov\u011b zji\u0161t\u011bn stav INT a\u00a0ostatn\u00ed vzorky byly hodnoceny jako PER). Lze tedy p\u0159edpokl\u00e1dat, \u017ee pokud u\u017e byla lokalita klasifikov\u00e1na jako VUL, k\u00a0ur\u010dit\u00e9, by\u0165 krat\u0161\u00ed epizod\u011b vyschnut\u00ed na\u00a0n\u00ed do\u0161lo. P\u0159i anal\u00fdze v\u00a0klasifika\u010dn\u00edm stromu bylo na\u00a0druhou stranu penalizov\u00e1no chybn\u00e9 za\u0159azen\u00ed lokalit INT i\u00a0VUL: jestli\u017ee ji\u017e byla lokalita ozna\u010dena jako v\u00edce \u010di m\u00e9n\u011b vysychav\u00e1, nem\u011bla by b\u00fdt \u0159azena do\u00a0koncov\u00fdch uzl\u016f klasifikace, reprezentuj\u00edc\u00edch mal\u00e9 riziko (R_0) ve\u00a0smyslu fale\u0161n\u011b negativn\u00edho v\u00fdsledku. Tato dv\u011b opat\u0159en\u00ed m\u011bla v\u00e9st k\u00a0objektivizaci v\u00fdsledn\u00e9 kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed z\u00a0hlediska rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n<p>Podle v\u00fdsledk\u016f navr\u017een\u00e9 kategorizace je t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 na\u00a0polovin\u011b \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR (45,3\u00a0%) riziko vysych\u00e1n\u00ed tok\u016f mal\u00e9 a\u00a0na\u00a0\u010dtvrtin\u011b st\u0159edn\u00ed (23,3\u00a0%). Pro t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 t\u0159etinu \u00fazem\u00ed (31,3\u00a0%) je v\u0161ak riziko odhadov\u00e1no jako velk\u00e9. M\u00edra rizika dan\u00e9ho \u00fazem\u00ed jednozna\u010dn\u011b souvis\u00ed s\u00a0pod\u00edlem nep\u0159\u00edzniv\u00e9ho typu krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu 2,\u00a0v\u011bt\u0161inov\u011b reprezentovan\u00e9m pod\u00edlem orn\u00e9 p\u016fdy. Pod\u00edl orn\u00e9 p\u016fdy v\u00a0\u010cR souvis\u00ed s\u00a0klimatick\u00fdmi podm\u00ednkami a\u00a0ty zase s\u00a0nadmo\u0159skou v\u00fd\u0161kou. Nen\u00ed tedy p\u0159ekvapiv\u00e9, \u017ee mal\u00e9 riziko vysych\u00e1n\u00ed tok\u016f je p\u0159ev\u00e1\u017en\u011b v\u00a0\u00fazem\u00edch nad hranic\u00ed 500\u00a0m\u00a0n.\u00a0m. Typ krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu 2 souvis\u00ed tak\u00e9 s\u00a0morfologick\u00fdm stavem tok\u016f\u00a0\u2013 v\u00a0zem\u011bd\u011blsky intenzivn\u011b vyu\u017e\u00edvan\u00fdch i\u00a0v\u00a0urbanizovan\u00fdch oblastech je nap\u0159imov\u00e1n\u00ed a\u00a0i\u00a0opev\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed tok\u016f mnohem \u010dast\u011bj\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e v\u00a0ostatn\u00edch \u00fazem\u00edch. V\u00a0hodnocen\u00e9m souboru byl pod\u00edl v\u00fdznamn\u011b morfologicky ovlivn\u011bn\u00fdch tok\u016f v\u00a0oblastech s\u00a0ni\u017e\u0161\u00edm pod\u00edlem krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu typu 2 (\u2264 0,568, cf.<em> obr.<\/em>\u00a0<em>9<\/em>) jen 3,3\u00a0%, zat\u00edmco v\u00a0oblastech s\u00a0jeho vy\u0161\u0161\u00edm pod\u00edlem to bylo 27\u00a0%. Vliv regulace tok\u016f na\u00a0zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed n\u00e1chylnosti tok\u016f k\u00a0vysych\u00e1n\u00ed je mnohokr\u00e1t dolo\u017een [1] a\u00a0je ji\u017e v\u0161eobecn\u011b akceptov\u00e1n [9].<\/p>\n<p>Vliv klimatick\u00fdch jev\u016f na\u00a0riziko vysych\u00e1n\u00ed je z\u0159ejm\u00fd\u00a0\u2013 v\u00fdskyt a\u00a0mno\u017estv\u00ed sr\u00e1\u017eek a\u00a0m\u00edra evapotranspirace jsou standardn\u011b u\u017e\u00edv\u00e1ny p\u0159i hodnocen\u00ed sucha za\u00a0pou\u017eit\u00ed r\u016fzn\u00fdch metod [2]. N\u00e1mi zvolen\u00fd p\u0159\u00edstup odvozen\u00ed mapy deficitu sr\u00e1\u017eek m\u00e1 v\u00fdhodu v\u00a0tom, \u017ee bude mo\u017en\u00e9 (i) mapu jednodu\u0161e aktualizovat na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b nov\u011bj\u0161\u00edch dat z\u00a0\u0159ad \u00fadaj\u016f v\u00a0gridov\u00e9 s\u00edti a\u00a0(ii) nastavovat m\u00edru podrobnosti kategorizace.<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-12.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"483\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1196 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-12.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-12\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-12.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-12-300x181.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/483;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr.\u00a012. Mapa pod\u00edlu j\u00edlovc\u016f v\u00a0podlo\u017e\u00ed v\u00a0povod\u00edch IV. \u0159\u00e1du; zobrazuje hodnoty hrani\u010dn\u00ed pro kategorizaci \u00fazem\u00ed (obr.\u00a09)<br \/>\nFig. 12. Map of the share of claystone bedrock in the 4<sup>th<\/sup> order catchments; borderline values used in the classification tree are displayed (fig. 9)<\/h6>\n<p>Vztah pr\u016ftok\u016f v\u010detn\u011b nulov\u00fdch k\u00a0dal\u0161\u00edm charakteristik\u00e1m prost\u0159ed\u00ed je ji\u017e komplikovan\u011bj\u0161\u00ed. P\u0159i hodnocen\u00ed nedostatkov\u00fdch pr\u016ftok\u016f na\u00a0z\u00e1klad\u011b dat z\u00a0hydrologick\u00fdch stanic [18] auto\u0159i citovan\u00e9 studie nenalezli, s\u00a0v\u00fdjimkou vazby k\u00a0pod\u00edlu j\u00edlovc\u016f v\u00a0podlo\u017e\u00ed, pr\u016fkaznou vazbu ke\u00a0sledovan\u00fdm charakteristik\u00e1m prost\u0159ed\u00ed (krajinn\u00fd pokryv, dal\u0161\u00ed typy podlo\u017e\u00ed). Mo\u017en\u00fdm d\u016fvodem je to, \u017ee hodnoceny byly v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed toky, kter\u00e9 si z\u00a0hlediska pr\u016ftokov\u00fdch re\u017eim\u016f uchov\u00e1vaj\u00ed hydrologick\u00fd re\u017eim z\u00a0vy\u0161\u0161\u00edch \u010d\u00e1st\u00ed povod\u00ed [16], zat\u00edmco toky ni\u017e\u0161\u00edch \u0159\u00e1d\u016f jsou z\u00e1vislej\u0161\u00ed na\u00a0lok\u00e1ln\u00edch podm\u00ednk\u00e1ch, a\u00a0vazbu tedy lze sn\u00e1ze detekovat. Nap\u0159\u00edklad pokud povod\u00edm proch\u00e1z\u00ed v\u00fdznamn\u00e1 hranice mezi okrsky geomorfologick\u00e9ho \u010dlen\u011bn\u00ed, znamen\u00e1 to obvykle, \u017ee toky jednak m\u011bn\u00ed sp\u00e1d, jednak se \u010dasto dost\u00e1vaj\u00ed na\u00a0hranice geologick\u00fdch jednotek, co\u017e m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt spojeno nap\u0159\u00edklad se zm\u011bnou propustnosti. Typickou situac\u00ed je jak\u00e9si zano\u0159en\u00ed ur\u010dit\u00e9ho \u00faseku toku, nap\u0159\u00edklad do\u00a0kvart\u00e9rn\u00edch sediment\u016f o\u00a0vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed mocnosti nebo podlo\u017e\u00ed z\u00a0r\u016fzn\u00fdch p\u0159\u00ed\u010din propustn\u011bj\u0161\u00edho, nap\u0159.\u00a0na\u00a0hranici krasov\u00fdch oblast\u00ed. Na\u00a0hranic\u00edch okrsk\u016f se v\u00a0\u0159ad\u011b p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f vyskytuj\u00ed tak\u00e9 tektonick\u00e9 poruchy, kter\u00e9 vedou k\u00a0tomu, \u017ee povrchov\u00fd pr\u016ftok na\u00a0ur\u010dit\u00e9m \u00faseku vymiz\u00ed. P\u0159\u00edkladem m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt \u00fasek toku Luha nad obc\u00ed Sloup na\u00a0hranici Moravsk\u00e9ho krasu.<\/p>\n<p>V\u00fdskyt oblast\u00ed s\u00a0krasovou propustnost\u00ed a\u00a0existence tektonick\u00fdch poruch jsou d\u016fle\u017eit\u00fdmi p\u0159\u00edrodn\u00edmi podm\u00ednkami ovliv\u0148uj\u00edc\u00edmi vodnost DVT. Oboj\u00ed \u00fazce souvis\u00ed se ztr\u00e1tou vody z\u00a0povrchov\u00e9ho toku, ale i\u00a0s\u00a0jej\u00ed dotac\u00ed z\u00a0podzemn\u00ed vody\u00a0\u2013 v\u00a0krasov\u00fdch oblastech jsou propad\u00e1n\u00ed i\u00a0v\u00fdv\u011bry, tak\u00e9 tektonick\u00e9 poruchy mohou p\u016fsobit obousm\u011brn\u011b. Nejednozna\u010dn\u00e9 byly z\u00a0tohoto pohledu i\u00a0v\u00fdsledky hodnocen\u00ed t\u011bchto charakteristik v\u00a0pou\u017eit\u00e9m souboru dat. I\u00a0z\u00a0t\u011bchto d\u016fvod\u016f nebyly charakteristiky pod\u00edl kras\u016f a\u00a0pseudokrasu a\u00a0v\u00fdskyt tektonick\u00fdch poruch zohledn\u011bny ve\u00a0v\u00fdsledn\u00e9 zobecn\u011bn\u00e9 map\u011b rizika. Z\u00a0hlediska p\u0159edb\u011b\u017en\u00e9 opatrnosti je v\u0161ak t\u0159eba p\u0159i posuzov\u00e1n\u00ed situace v\u00a0povod\u00ed p\u0159ihl\u00e9dnout i\u00a0k\u00a0v\u00fdskytu t\u011bchto jev\u016f. Zejm\u00e9na v\u00a0oblastech krasov\u00fdch, ale i\u00a0pseudokrasov\u00fdch, kter\u00fdch je v\u00a0\u010cR pom\u011brn\u011b dost (<em>obr.\u00a05<\/em>), jedn\u00e1 se nap\u0159.\u00a0o\u00a0oblasti p\u00edskovcov\u00fdch skaln\u00edch m\u011bst, doch\u00e1z\u00ed k\u00a0vysych\u00e1n\u00ed tok\u016f \u010dasto [35]. P\u0159\u00edkladem intermitentn\u00edho toku v\u00a0oblasti, kde nep\u016fsob\u00ed jin\u00e9 negativn\u00ed vlivy ne\u017e krasov\u00e9 podlo\u017e\u00ed a\u00a0existence tektonick\u00e9 poruchy, je ji\u017e zmi\u0148ovan\u00fd potok Oblou\u010dn\u00edk pobl\u00ed\u017e V\u00e1penn\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Z\u00a0antropogenn\u00edch vliv\u016f mimo v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00fd typ krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu m\u00e1 zcela jist\u011b z\u00e1va\u017en\u00fd vliv intenzita odb\u011br\u016f vody jak p\u0159\u00edmo z\u00a0tok\u016f, tak z\u00a0vod podzemn\u00edch. Informace o\u00a0odb\u011brech a\u00a0vypou\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed vod jsou v\u0161ak centr\u00e1ln\u011b evidov\u00e1ny a\u017e od\u00a0ur\u010dit\u00e9ho objemu. V\u00a0datab\u00e1zi HEIS jsou podchyceny odb\u011bry od\u00a0objemu p\u0159esahuj\u00edc\u00edho 6\u2009000\u2008m3 za\u00a0rok, resp. 500\u2008m3 za\u00a0m\u011bs\u00edc a\u00a0data z\u00a0t\u00e9to datab\u00e1ze testovan\u00e1 autory v\u00a0p\u0159edchoz\u00edch v\u00fdzkumech nevykazovala souvislost s\u00a0vysych\u00e1n\u00edm DVT. Vliv centr\u00e1ln\u011b neevidovan\u00fdch odb\u011br\u016f vody, a\u0165 ji\u017e nap\u0159\u00edklad z\u00a0potok\u016f pro\u00a0z\u00e1vlahy zahrad, nebo vrty z\u00e1sobuj\u00edc\u00edmi pitnou vodou jednotliv\u00e9 obce, zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00e9 podniky \u010di rekrea\u010dn\u00ed objekty, byl v\u0161ak zjevn\u00fd jak p\u0159i podrobn\u00e9m hydrogeologick\u00e9m hodnocen\u00ed vybran\u00fdch lokalit [19], tak p\u0159i ter\u00e9nn\u00edch pr\u016fzkumech. Tento jev, nav\u00edc zna\u010dn\u011b prom\u011bnliv\u00fd v\u00a0\u010dase, v\u0161ak nelze objektivn\u011b hodnotit tak, aby vznikla vrstva GIS pou\u017eiteln\u00e1 pro kategorizaci \u00fazem\u00ed, z\u010d\u00e1sti je v\u0161ak velmi pravd\u011bpodobn\u011b podchycen p\u0159i kategorizaci krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu v\u00a0polo\u017ek\u00e1ch urbanizovan\u00e1 \u00fazem\u00ed a\u00a0komplexn\u00ed syst\u00e9my kultur a\u00a0parcel.<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-13.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"483\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1197 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-13.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-13\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-13.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-13-300x181.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/483;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr.\u00a013. Mapa v\u00fdskytu v\u00fdznamn\u00fdch geomorfologick\u00fdch hranic v\u00a0povod\u00edch IV. \u0159\u00e1du; zobrazuje hodnoty hrani\u010dn\u00ed pro kategorizaci \u00fazem\u00ed (obr.\u00a09)<br \/>\nFig. 13. Map of the occurrence of important geomorphological boundaries within 4<sup>th<\/sup> order catchments; borderline values used in the classification tree are displayed (fig. 9)<\/h6>\n<p>Jako situace vedouc\u00ed k\u00a0\u010dast\u00e9mu v\u00fdskytu vysych\u00e1n\u00ed DVT byla vyhodnocena kombinace vysok\u00e9ho pod\u00edlu typu 2 krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu a\u00a0relativn\u011b vysok\u00e9ho pod\u00edlu ploch stojat\u00fdch vod v\u00a0povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du. Do\u00a0koncov\u00e9ho uzlu \u010d.\u00a07 (cf. <em>obr.\u00a09<\/em>), kter\u00fd tuto kombinaci podm\u00ednek p\u0159edstavuje, byla za\u0159azena v\u00edce ne\u017e polovina (31 z\u00a059) lokalit klasifikovan\u00fdch pomoc\u00ed bioindika\u010dn\u00ed metody jako INT.<\/p>\n<p>Pokud hodnot\u00edme cel\u00fd soubor 332 lokalit, pak z\u00a0celkov\u00e9ho po\u010dtu 59 lokalit klasifikovan\u00fdch jako INT se nach\u00e1zelo 43 v\u00a0povod\u00edch s\u00a0pod\u00edlem ploch stojat\u00fdch vod v\u00a0pr\u016fm\u011bru cca\u00a07\u00a0\u2030 (pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00fd pod\u00edl nep\u0159\u00edzniv\u00e9ho krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu typu 2 byl 59\u00a0% plochy povod\u00ed pro lokality INT). Pro lokality PER tyto hodnoty odpov\u00eddaly 3\u00a0\u2030 a\u00a026\u00a0%. Pro ob\u011b charakteristiky byl zji\u0161t\u011bn pr\u016fkazn\u00fd rozd\u00edl mezi PER a\u00a0INT lokalitami (viz\u00a0V\u00fdsledky).<\/p>\n<p>Tento v\u00fdsledek, mo\u017en\u00e1 p\u0159ekvapiv\u00fd, je v\u0161ak logicky vysv\u011btliteln\u00fd. Pro drobn\u00e9 vodn\u00ed toky jsou z\u00a0hlediska ovlivn\u011bn\u00ed pr\u016ftokov\u00e9ho re\u017eimu v\u00fdznamn\u00e9 mal\u00e9 vodn\u00ed n\u00e1dr\u017ee (MVN), budovan\u00e9 p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm pro \u00fa\u010dely z\u00e1vlah, rekreace a\u00a0chovu ryb.\u00a0Vlivu MVN, zejm\u00e9na rybni\u010dn\u00edho typu, na\u00a0hydrologick\u00fd re\u017eim drobn\u00fdch tok\u016f nebyla v\u00a0\u010cR v\u011bnov\u00e1na p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 velk\u00e1 pozornost, a\u010dkoliv jejich po\u010det je v\u00a0na\u0161\u00ed zemi velmi vysok\u00fd, jen rybn\u00edk\u016f je v\u00a0r\u016fzn\u00fdch zdroj\u00edch ud\u00e1v\u00e1no kolem 20\u2009000 [36]. V\u00a0b\u011b\u017en\u00fdch typech MVN jde prim\u00e1rn\u011b o\u00a0zadr\u017een\u00ed vody v\u00a0n\u00e1dr\u017ei pro n\u011bjak\u00fd ekonomick\u00fd \u00fa\u010del a\u00a0z\u00a0toho d\u016fvodu obvykle tak\u00e9 o\u00a0udr\u017een\u00ed ur\u010dit\u00e9 k\u00f3ty hladiny, pop\u0159\u00edpad\u011b o\u00a0n\u00e1razov\u00e9 vypou\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed v\u00a0podzimn\u00edch m\u011bs\u00edc\u00edch (v\u00fdlovy rybn\u00edk\u016f). V\u00a0tepl\u00fdch a\u00a0such\u00fdch obdob\u00edch doch\u00e1z\u00ed, zejm\u00e9na z\u00a0d\u016fvodu zachov\u00e1n\u00ed dostate\u010dn\u00e9ho objemu vody nap\u0159.\u00a0pro p\u0159e\u017eit\u00ed ryb, k\u00a0zadr\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed vody v\u00a0n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00edch, v\u00a0tomto obdob\u00ed doch\u00e1z\u00ed tak\u00e9 zajist\u00e9 k\u00a0nezanedbateln\u00e9mu odparu z\u00a0hladiny [37], kter\u00fd m\u016f\u017ee i\u00a0p\u0159ev\u00fd\u0161it p\u0159\u00edtok. Pokles hladiny vody v\u00a0n\u00e1dr\u017ei vede tak\u00e9 k\u00a0v\u011bt\u0161\u00edmu proh\u0159\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed vody s\u00a0dopady na\u00a0jakost vody nejen v\u00a0samotn\u00e9 n\u00e1dr\u017ei, ale n\u00e1sledn\u011b i\u00a0v\u00a0toku pod hr\u00e1z\u00ed. Zaji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed st\u00e1l\u00e9ho pr\u016ftoku pod n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00ed zjevn\u011b neb\u00fdv\u00e1 v\u00a0praxi p\u0159i manipulaci prioritou, co\u017e odpov\u00edd\u00e1 zku\u0161enostem z\u00a0ter\u00e9nn\u00edch pozorov\u00e1n\u00ed autor\u016f. K\u00a0situac\u00edm, \u017ee voda zadr\u017een\u00e1 v\u00a0n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00edch nen\u00ed v\u00a0obdob\u00ed sucha vypou\u0161t\u011bna, doch\u00e1z\u00ed nejen ve\u00a0vzd\u00e1len\u00fdch aridn\u00edch oblastech nebo bli\u017e\u0161\u00edm evropsk\u00e9m mediter\u00e1nu [38], ale i\u00a0v\u00a0podm\u00ednk\u00e1ch \u010cR. Dokladem toho m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt mimo jin\u00e9 i\u00a0reakce na\u00a0extr\u00e9mn\u00ed sucho v\u00a0roce 2015 ve\u00a0smyslu zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed kontrol zam\u011b\u0159en\u00fdch na\u00a0dodr\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed manipula\u010dn\u00edch \u0159\u00e1d\u016f a\u00a0zaji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed minim\u00e1ln\u00edch z\u016fstatkov\u00fdch pr\u016ftok\u016f v\u00a0toc\u00edch (viz\u00a0nap\u0159.\u00a0www.cizp.cz).<\/p>\n<h3>Srovn\u00e1n\u00ed map kategorizac\u00ed \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR ve\u00a0vztahu k\u00a0vysych\u00e1n\u00ed<\/h3>\n<p>V\u00fdslednou kategorizaci \u00fazem\u00ed, p\u0159edkl\u00e1danou v\u00a0t\u00e9to pr\u00e1ci, je mo\u017eno srovn\u00e1vat s\u00a0\u0159adou kategorizac\u00ed \u010cR ve\u00a0vztahu k\u00a0jev\u016fm klimatick\u00fdm, hydrologick\u00fdm a\u00a0zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fdm i\u00a0socioekonomick\u00fdm rizik\u016fm spojen\u00fdm se suchem, kter\u00e9 jsou k\u00a0dispozici v\u00a0mapov\u00e9 podob\u011b. Pro konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed srovn\u00e1n\u00ed jsou pak nejvhodn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed mapy zobecn\u011bn\u00e9, postihuj\u00edc\u00ed dlouhodob\u00fd stav nebo rizika.<\/p>\n<p>Ve\u00a0srovn\u00e1n\u00ed s\u00a0mapami klimatick\u00fdmi, nap\u0159.\u00a0pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00fdch ro\u010dn\u00edch nebo \u010dervencov\u00fdch teplot vzduchu \u010di pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00e9ho ro\u010dn\u00edho \u00fahrnu sr\u00e1\u017eek, vykazuje mapa rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed DVT r\u00e1mcovou shodu ve\u00a0vymezen\u00ed mal\u00e9ho rizika v\u00a0oblastech sr\u00e1\u017ekov\u011b p\u0159\u00edzniv\u011bj\u0161\u00edch, stejn\u011b jako ve\u00a0vymezen\u00ed velk\u00e9ho rizika na\u00a0jihu Moravy, \u010cesk\u00e9 tabule a\u00a0Podkru\u0161nohorsk\u00e9 oblasti. Rozd\u00edln\u00e9 je v\u0161ak hodnocen\u00ed v\u00a0oblasti Z\u00e1padobeskydsk\u00e9ho podh\u016f\u0159\u00ed (v\u00fdrazn\u00e9 zm\u011bny reli\u00e9fu, \u010dast\u011bj\u0161\u00ed tektonick\u00e9 poruchy, nep\u0159\u00edzniv\u011bj\u0161\u00ed krajinn\u00fd pokryv) a\/nebo i\u00a0chladn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch (\u010d\u00e1st \u010ceskomoravsk\u00e9 vrchoviny s\u00a0vy\u0161\u0161\u00edm pod\u00edlem orn\u00e9 p\u016fdy a\u00a0vodn\u00edch ploch), kter\u00e9 podle n\u00e1mi navrhovan\u00e9 kategorizace pat\u0159\u00ed k\u00a0oblastem s\u00a0velk\u00fdm rizikem vysych\u00e1n\u00ed DVT. P\u0159ev\u00e1\u017en\u011b velk\u00e9 riziko vysych\u00e1n\u00ed DVT bylo n\u00e1mi stanoveno tak\u00e9 pro \u010d\u00e1st oblasti Jiho\u010desk\u00fdch p\u00e1nv\u00ed a\u00a0\u010d\u00e1sti St\u0159edo\u010desk\u00e9 pahorkatiny, kter\u00e9 jsou nap\u0159.\u00a0podle pod\u00edlu hodnot odvozen\u00fdch od\u00a0v\u00fdznamn\u00e9 metriky pro hodnocen\u00ed zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00e9ho sucha, Palmerova Z\u00ad\u2011indexu [2, 12] klasifikov\u00e1ny v\u011bt\u0161inou do\u00a0st\u0159edn\u00edch nebo ni\u017e\u0161\u00edch hodnot z\u00a0hlediska frekvence v\u00fdskytu sucha.<\/p>\n<p>Pro srovn\u00e1n\u00ed s\u00a0v\u00fdsledky hydrologick\u00fdch hodnocen\u00ed jsme pou\u017eili mapu trend\u016f ro\u010dn\u00edch standardizovan\u00fdch nedostatkov\u00fdch objem\u016f vymezen\u00fdch prahov\u00fdm pr\u016ftokem Q95 v\u00a0obdob\u00ed 1961\u20132007 (varianta pro p\u0159irozen\u00e9 pr\u016ftoky) [18]. Rostouc\u00ed trend, tedy siln\u011bj\u0161\u00ed tendence ke\u00a0zv\u011bt\u0161ov\u00e1n\u00ed sucha, byl zji\u0161t\u011bn na\u00a0n\u011bkter\u00fdch stanic\u00edch v\u00a0horn\u00ed \u010d\u00e1sti povod\u00ed Vltavy, st\u0159edn\u00ed \u010d\u00e1sti povod\u00ed S\u00e1zavy, v\u00a0povod\u00ed Orlice a\u00a0po\u010detn\u011bji tak\u00e9 u\u00a0\u0159eky Moravy. To je ve\u00a0shod\u011b s\u00a0n\u00e1mi navrhovanou kategorizac\u00ed, a\u010dkoliv hydrologick\u00e1 hodnocen\u00ed se t\u00fdkaj\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161\u00edch tok\u016f. Jako stanice bez trendu byly hodnoceny ty, kter\u00e9 se nach\u00e1zej\u00ed v\u00a0povod\u00ed Berounky a\u00a0Dyje, tam se mapa kategorizace pro DVT odli\u0161uje.<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-14.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"483\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1198 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-14.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-14\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-14.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-14-300x181.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/483;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr.\u00a014. Mapa pod\u00edlu vybran\u00fdch stojat\u00fdch vod v\u00a0povod\u00edch IV. \u0159\u00e1du; zobrazuje hodnoty hrani\u010dn\u00ed pro kategorizaci \u00fazem\u00ed (obr.\u00a09)<br \/>\nFig. 14. Map of the share of selected stagnant surface waters in the 4<sup>th<\/sup> order catchments\u00a0(for explanation see Fig. 8); borderline values used in the classification tree are displayed (fig. 9)<\/h6>\n<p>Mrkvi\u010dkov\u00e1 a\u00a0Balv\u00edn [16] navrhli kategorizaci \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR do\u00a0\u010dty\u0159 typ\u016f oblast\u00ed v\u00a0z\u00e1vislosti na\u00a0charakteru hydrologick\u00e9ho re\u017eimu a\u00a0na\u00a0kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00fdch procesech, kter\u00e9 se v\u00a0dan\u00e9 oblasti pod\u00edlej\u00ed na\u00a0tvorb\u011b odtoku. Toto \u010dlen\u011bn\u00ed bylo vytvo\u0159eno pro n\u00e1vrh variantn\u00edho postupu stanoven\u00ed minim\u00e1ln\u00edch z\u016fstatkov\u00fdch pr\u016ftok\u016f v\u00a0toc\u00edch. Zohled\u0148uje mimo hydrologick\u00e9 charakteristiky tak\u00e9 hydrogeologick\u00e9 pom\u011bry a\u00a0nadmo\u0159skou v\u00fd\u0161ku a\u00a0zav\u00e1d\u00ed parametr v\u00a0podstat\u011b vystihuj\u00edc\u00ed vyrovnanost (rozkol\u00edsanost) pr\u016ftok\u016f v\u00a0toc\u00edch. Z\u00a0na\u0161eho hlediska to lze ch\u00e1pat jako ur\u010dit\u00e9 m\u011b\u0159\u00edtko n\u00e1chylnosti tok\u016f k\u00a0vysych\u00e1n\u00ed. Kategorie 4 navr\u017een\u00e1 citovan\u00fdmi autory, tedy s\u00a0pr\u016ftoky nejv\u00edce rozkol\u00edsan\u00fdmi, do\u00a0zna\u010dn\u00e9 m\u00edry odpov\u00edd\u00e1 oblastem s\u00a0velk\u00fdm \u010di st\u0159edn\u00edm rizikem vysych\u00e1n\u00ed DVT podle kategorizace p\u0159edkl\u00e1dan\u00e9 v\u00a0na\u0161\u00ed studii. Rozd\u00edln\u00e9 je hodnocen\u00ed v\u00a0\u00fazem\u00ed hydrogeologick\u00e9ho rajonu 4710, 4720 a\u00a04730 baz\u00e1ln\u00edch k\u0159\u00eddov\u00fdch kolektor\u016f a\u00a0tak\u00e9 n\u011bkter\u00fdch z\u00e1kladn\u00edch rajon\u016f, obvykle tak\u00e9 ve\u00a0vazb\u011b na\u00a0k\u0159\u00eddu, kter\u00e9 jsou v\u00a0pr\u00e1ci Mrkvi\u010dkov\u00e9 a\u00a0Balv\u00edna [16] hodnoceny jako p\u0159\u00edzniv\u00e9, nicm\u00e9n\u011b z\u00a0hlediska na\u0161\u00ed kategorizace jsou hodnoceny odli\u0161n\u011b. V\u00a0oblasti baz\u00e1ln\u00edch k\u0159\u00eddov\u00fdch kolektor\u016f je objektivn\u011b n\u00edzk\u00e1 hustota \u0159\u00ed\u010dn\u00ed s\u00edt\u011b a\u00a0vysok\u00e1 propustnost podlo\u017e\u00ed, m\u00e1 z\u010d\u00e1sti pseudokrasov\u00fd charakter. Na\u00a0DVT zde doch\u00e1z\u00ed k\u00a0epizod\u00e1m vyschnut\u00ed (nap\u0159.\u00a0Ole\u0161ni\u010dka, p\u0159\u00edtok Kamenice, u\u00a0obce Star\u00e1 Ole\u0161ka, srpen\u00a02003 a\u00a02004).<\/p>\n<p>Pro hodnocen\u00ed socioekonomick\u00e9ho sucha existuje \u0159ada postup\u016f, pou\u017e\u00edvan\u00e9 ukazatele v\u0161ak vedou k\u00a0tomu, \u017ee s\u00a0kategorizac\u00ed DVT podle rizika jejich vysych\u00e1n\u00ed souvis\u00ed jen z\u010d\u00e1sti. Zaj\u00edmav\u00e9 je srovn\u00e1n\u00ed s\u00a0v\u00fdsledky multikriteri\u00e1ln\u00ed anal\u00fdzy definuj\u00edc\u00ed katastry nejv\u00edce ohro\u017een\u00e9 suchem a\u00a0p\u0159\u00edvalov\u00fdmi sr\u00e1\u017ekami, zpracovan\u00e9 pro Generel vodn\u00edho hospod\u00e1\u0159stv\u00ed v\u00a0\u010cR [2], kdy se n\u00e1mi navrhovan\u00e1 kategorizace podob\u00e1 map\u011b prezentuj\u00edc\u00ed hodnoty pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00e9ho z\u00ad\u2011sk\u00f3re, kter\u00e9 v\u00a0tomto generelu ud\u00e1v\u00e1 m\u00edru ohro\u017een\u00ed \u00fazem\u00ed suchem.<\/p>\n<p>Jako kategorizace nejbli\u017e\u0161\u00ed n\u00e1mi vytvo\u0159en\u00e9 variant\u011b se jev\u00ed mapa zranitelnosti \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR v\u016f\u010di suchu v\u00a0z\u00e1vislosti na\u00a0ro\u010dn\u00edm v\u00fdskytu stresu suchem [2], kter\u00e1 je mimo jin\u00e9 zalo\u017eena na\u00a0schopnosti ekosyst\u00e9m\u016f poskytovat ekosyst\u00e9mov\u00e9 slu\u017eby v\u00a0z\u00e1vislosti na\u00a0ro\u010dn\u00edm v\u00fdskytu stresu suchem. Podobnost obou n\u00e1vrh\u016f m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt d\u00e1na mimo jin\u00e9 t\u00edm, \u017ee v\u00a0ekosyst\u00e9mov\u00e9m pojet\u00ed je zahrnuta i\u00a0fragmentace krajiny.<\/p>\n<h3>V\u00fdsti\u017enost a\u00a0mo\u017enosti vyu\u017eit\u00ed navrhovan\u00e9 kategorizace drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f<\/h3>\n<p>Navrhovan\u00e1 kategorizace je zalo\u017eena na\u00a0anal\u00fdze spole\u010denstev \u017eiv\u00fdch organism\u016f, co\u017e v\u017edy p\u0159in\u00e1\u0161\u00ed ur\u010ditou m\u00edru variability v\u00a0datech. Spolehlivost vymezen\u00ed oblast\u00ed je p\u0159ibli\u017en\u011b 80\u00a0% z\u00a0hlediska v\u00fdskytu \u00fasek\u016f tok\u016f permanentn\u00edch nebo intermitentn\u00edch. Nutno \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee vzhledem k\u00a0v\u00fdznamn\u00e9 roli lok\u00e1ln\u00edch podm\u00ednek nen\u00ed re\u00e1ln\u00e9 postihnout v\u0161echny faktory, vedouc\u00ed k\u00a0faktick\u00e9mu vyschnut\u00ed ur\u010dit\u00e9ho, v\u00a0n\u011bkter\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech jen relativn\u011b kr\u00e1tk\u00e9ho \u00faseku toku. Kategorizaci \u00fazem\u00ed proto nelze br\u00e1t zcela striktn\u011b v\u00a0tom smyslu, \u017ee v\u0161echny toky v\u00a0\u00fazem\u00ed s\u00a0velk\u00fdm rizikem v\u00a0obdob\u00ed sucha vyschnou a\u00a0naopak, \u017ee v\u00a0oblastech s\u00a0mal\u00fdm rizikem nem\u016f\u017ee vyschnut\u00ed tok\u016f nikdy nastat. I\u00a0tam m\u016f\u017ee nap\u0159\u00edklad p\u0159i soub\u011bhu nep\u0159\u00edzniv\u00fdch klimatick\u00fdch podm\u00ednek a\u00a0nevhodn\u00fdch z\u00e1sah\u016f \u010dlov\u011bka doch\u00e1zet k\u00a0vysych\u00e1n\u00ed tok\u016f, jak tomu bylo pr\u00e1v\u011b v\u00a0roce 2015 [8].<\/p>\n<p>Navrhovan\u00e1 kategorizace bude v\u00a0podob\u011b interaktivn\u00ed mapy k\u00a0dispozici na\u00a0webov\u00fdch str\u00e1nk\u00e1ch HEIS. Pro ka\u017ed\u00e9 povod\u00ed IV. \u0159\u00e1du bude zobrazen stupe\u0148\u00a0rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed DVT a\u00a0uvedeny charakteristiky, kter\u00e9 riziko definuj\u00ed, v\u010detn\u011b upozorn\u011bn\u00ed na\u00a0to, zda se na\u00a0\u00fazem\u00ed povod\u00ed vyskytuj\u00ed krasy, pseudokrasy a\u00a0v\u00fdznamn\u00e9 tektonick\u00e9 poruchy jako potenci\u00e1ln\u011b rizikov\u00e9 faktory, kter\u00e9 mohou spolup\u016fsobit p\u0159i vyschnut\u00ed koryta na\u00a0konkr\u00e9tn\u00edm \u00faseku.<\/p>\n<p>V\u00fdsledn\u00e1 mapa m\u00e1 za\u00a0c\u00edl doplnit r\u016fzn\u00e9 n\u00e1hledy na\u00a0rizika spojen\u00e1 s\u00a0v\u00fdskytem sucha, a\u00a0to pro DVT, co\u017e bylo t\u00e9ma dosud opom\u00edjen\u00e9, a\u010dkoliv \u010cR je zem\u00ed s\u00a0jejich relativn\u011b vysok\u00fdm pod\u00edlem v\u00a0\u0159\u00ed\u010dn\u00ed s\u00edti. Podklad je vyu\u017eiteln\u00fd p\u0159i rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed v\u00a0r\u016fzn\u00fdch resortech, zejm\u00e9na p\u0159i rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed o\u00a0nakl\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed s\u00a0vodami a\u00a0o\u00a0priorit\u00e1ch p\u0159i alokac\u00edch prost\u0159edk\u016f pro boj se suchem, stejn\u011b jako pro \u00fazemn\u00ed pl\u00e1nov\u00e1n\u00ed \u010di ochranu ekosyst\u00e9m\u016f.<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-15.jpg\" rel=\"shadowbox[sbpost-1303];player=img;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"483\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1199 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-15.jpg\" alt=\"zahradkova-15\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-15.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/zahradkova-15-300x181.jpg 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/483;\" \/><\/a>\n<h6>Obr.\u00a015. Kategorizace \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky podle m\u00edry rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f; odvozeno od\u00a0v\u00fdsledk\u016f klasifikace lokalit metodou klasifika\u010dn\u00edho<br \/>\nstromu; R_0 mal\u00e9 riziko, R_1 st\u0159edn\u00ed riziko, R_2 velk\u00e9 riziko vysych\u00e1n\u00ed drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f<br \/>\nFig. 15. The categorization of the Czech Republic area according to the risk of drying up of small streams as predicted by the classification tree (see Fig. 9); R_0 low risk,\u00a0R_1 medium risk, R_2 high risk of drying up of small streams<\/h6>\n<p>V\u00a0tomto kontextu je t\u0159eba zd\u016fraznit, \u017ee jako hlavn\u00ed faktor, vedouc\u00ed k\u00a0vysych\u00e1n\u00ed DVT, byla detekov\u00e1na kombinace p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00edc\u00edho nep\u0159\u00edzniv\u00e9ho typu krajinn\u00e9ho pokryvu a\u00a0vy\u0161\u0161\u00edho pod\u00edlu vodn\u00edch ploch\u00a0\u2013 mal\u00fdch vodn\u00edch n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00ed. Pokud se t\u00fdk\u00e1 n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00ed, nejedn\u00e1 se o\u00a0p\u0159ekvapiv\u00fd v\u00fdsledek, kter\u00fd by nebyl z\u00a0odborn\u00e9 literatury zn\u00e1m. Jev je dolo\u017een z\u00a0oblast\u00ed s\u00a0aridn\u00edm klimatem, jako je ji\u017en\u00ed Austr\u00e1lie a\u00a0ji\u017en\u00ed Afrika [1], ale i\u00a0z\u00a0evropsk\u00e9 temper\u00e1tn\u00ed z\u00f3ny\u00a0\u2013 povod\u00ed Loiry [39].\u00a0Kumulativn\u00ed vliv mal\u00fdch n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00ed v\u00a0povod\u00ed m\u016f\u017ee v\u00e9st ke\u00a0sn\u00ed\u017een\u00ed pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00fdch ro\u010dn\u00edch pr\u016ftok\u016f zhruba o\u00a020\u00a0% v\u00a0aridn\u00edch oblastech a\u00a0o\u00a0cca\u00a07\u00a0% v\u00a0m\u00edrn\u00e9m p\u00e1smu [39]. Lake [1] uv\u00e1d\u00ed, \u017ee omezen\u00ed objemu vody zadr\u017eovan\u00e9 v\u00a0t\u011bchto n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00edch m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt d\u016fle\u017eit\u00fdm opat\u0159en\u00edm ke\u00a0zm\u00edrn\u011bn\u00ed negativn\u00edch vliv\u016f sucha. Je tedy t\u0159eba pe\u010dliv\u011b zva\u017eovat v\u00fdb\u011br opat\u0159en\u00ed v\u00a0boji proti suchu, zejm\u00e9na t\u011bch, kter\u00e1 maj\u00ed v\u00e9st k\u00a0zadr\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed vody v\u00a0krajin\u011b. Existence n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00ed sice pom\u016f\u017ee vytvo\u0159it disponibiln\u00ed z\u00e1sobu vody, nicm\u00e9n\u011b z\u00a0hlediska vodn\u00edho re\u017eimu samotn\u00e9ho toku i\u00a0okoln\u00ed krajiny to v\u0161ak m\u016f\u017ee situaci zhor\u0161it [40]. Lapid\u00e1rn\u011b \u0159e\u010deno, voda zadr\u017een\u00e1 v\u00a0mal\u00e9 n\u00e1dr\u017ei je vodou zadr\u017eenou v\u00a0n\u00e1dr\u017ei, nikoliv v\u00a0komplexn\u00ed struktu\u0159e krajiny, kter\u00e1 ji m\u016f\u017ee postupn\u011b uvol\u0148ovat a\u00a0omezovat tak rizika \u00fapln\u00e9ho vyschnut\u00ed koryta toku i\u00a0p\u016fdy v\u00a0povod\u00ed. P\u0159i vyu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed mal\u00fdch n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00ed je dal\u0161\u00edm probl\u00e9mem snaha o\u00a0v\u00edce\u00fa\u010delovost. Sladit nap\u0159\u00edklad po\u017eadavky pro chov ryb a\u00a0zachov\u00e1n\u00ed minim\u00e1ln\u00edho z\u016fstatkov\u00e9ho pr\u016ftoku se v\u00a0obdob\u00ed sucha m\u016f\u017ee snadno st\u00e1t nemo\u017en\u00fdm.<\/p>\n<p>Lake [1] uv\u00e1d\u00ed jako postup vedouc\u00ed ke\u00a0zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed rezilience a\u00a0rezistence akvatick\u00fdch ekosyst\u00e9m\u016f v\u016f\u010di suchu n\u00e1vrat k\u00a0p\u0159irozen\u00fdm pr\u016ftokov\u00fdm re\u017eim\u016fm nebo alespo\u0148 zaji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed tzv.\u00a0environment\u00e1ln\u00edch pr\u016ftok\u016f (tj.\u00a0minim\u00e1ln\u00ed z\u016fstatkov\u00e9 pr\u016ftoky), obnovu pod\u00e9ln\u00e9 i\u00a0p\u0159\u00ed\u010dn\u00e9 konektivity toku, umo\u017en\u011bn\u00ed povod\u0148ov\u00fdch rozliv\u016f k\u00a0dopln\u011bn\u00ed z\u00e1sob podzemn\u00ed vody a\u00a0samoz\u0159ejm\u011b renaturaci \u010di revitalizaci tok\u016f a\u00a0vhodn\u00fd management vyu\u017eit\u00ed krajiny. Je z\u0159ejm\u00e9, \u017ee se jedn\u00e1 o\u00a0procesy, kter\u00e9 jsou z\u00a0hlediska realizace jednak pom\u011brn\u011b obt\u00ed\u017en\u00e9, jednak obvykle \u010dasov\u011b n\u00e1ro\u010dn\u00e9. Usnesen\u00ed vl\u00e1dy k\u00a0p\u0159\u00edprav\u011b realizace opat\u0159en\u00ed pro zm\u00edrn\u011bn\u00ed negativn\u00edch dopad\u016f sucha a\u00a0nedostatku vody, kter\u00e9 m\u00e1 v\u00e9st k\u00a0vytvo\u0159en\u00ed koncepce ochrany p\u0159ed n\u00e1sledky sucha, d\u00e1v\u00e1 prostor pro racion\u00e1ln\u00ed v\u00fdb\u011br t\u011bchto opat\u0159en\u00ed. V\u00a0povod\u00edch drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch tok\u016f s\u00a0p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00edc\u00ed ornou p\u016fdou jsou z\u0159ejm\u011b z\u00e1sadn\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed v\u00a0krajin\u011b, zejm\u00e9na ve\u00a0zp\u016fsobu hospoda\u0159en\u00ed. Na\u00a0prvn\u00edm m\u00edst\u011b by tedy m\u011blo b\u00fdt zhodnocen\u00ed sou\u010dasn\u00e9ho stavu se zohledn\u011bn\u00edm rizika vysych\u00e1n\u00ed tok\u016f a\u00a0ekonomicky od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00fd propo\u010det p\u0159\u00ednos\u016f navrhovan\u00fdch opat\u0159en\u00ed ve\u00a0vztahu k\u00a0n\u00e1klad\u016fm. P\u0159\u00edrod\u011b bli\u017e\u0161\u00ed a\u00a0\u010dasto levn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed jako renaturace, pop\u0159.\u00a0revitalizace tok\u016f, obnova mok\u0159ad\u016f a\u00a0vhodn\u00e9 pozemkov\u00e9 \u00fapravy tak mohou b\u00fdt v\u00fdrazn\u011b p\u0159\u00ednosn\u011bj\u0161\u00edm a\u00a0ekonomi\u010dt\u011bj\u0161\u00edm opat\u0159en\u00edm ne\u017e masivn\u00ed v\u00fdstavba dal\u0161\u00edch men\u0161\u00edch n\u00e1dr\u017e\u00ed. Ty v\u00a0obdob\u00ed sucha pr\u016ftoky v\u00a0na\u0161ich drobn\u00fdch vysychaj\u00edc\u00edch toc\u00edch nadlep\u0161ovat z\u0159ejm\u011b nebudou, sp\u00ed\u0161e naopak.<\/p>\n<h3>Pod\u011bkov\u00e1n\u00ed<\/h3>\n<p><em>Auto\u0159i d\u011bkuj\u00ed podniku Povod\u00ed Moravy,\u00a0s.\u00a0p., za\u00a0zp\u0159\u00edstupn\u011bn\u00ed dat z\u00a0informa\u010dn\u00edho syst\u00e9mu SALAMANDER, bez kter\u00fdch by tato studie nemohla vzniknout. \u010cesk\u00e9mu hydrometeorologick\u00e9mu \u00fastavu d\u011bkuj\u00ed za\u00a0souhlas s\u00a0vyu\u017eit\u00edm klimatick\u00fdch dat zpracovan\u00fdch do\u00a0\u00fadaj\u016f v\u00a0gridov\u00e9 s\u00edti. V\u00a0neposledn\u00ed \u0159ad\u011b pat\u0159\u00ed d\u00edk po\u010detn\u00e9mu t\u00fdmu pracovn\u00edk\u016f a\u00a0spolupracovn\u00edk\u016f b\u00fdval\u00e9 Zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00e9 vodohospod\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9 spr\u00e1vy, kte\u0159\u00ed nashrom\u00e1\u017edili a\u00a0zpracovali velk\u00e9 mno\u017estv\u00ed \u00fadaj\u016f o\u00a0drobn\u00fdch vodn\u00edch toc\u00edch \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky. \u010cl\u00e1nek vznikl s\u00a0podporou Technologick\u00e9 agentury \u010cR, v\u00a0r\u00e1mci projektu \u010d.\u00a0TA02020395.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A categorization of the Czech Republic territory in terms of the risk of drying up of small streams (1st to 4th order by Strahler) was proposed. Three levels of risk (low, medium and high) for basic hydrological units (catchment) were set. The risk levels were defined using selected abiotic characteristics of the hydrological units and their combinations. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":1199,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[91],"tags":[198,199,121,197,194,196,200,195],"coauthors":[169,170,37,171,172,173,174,175],"class_list":["post-1303","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-applied-ecology","tag-benthic-macroinvertebrate","tag-bioindication","tag-drought","tag-land-cover","tag-map","tag-precipitation-deficit","tag-running-water","tag-stream"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1303","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1303"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1303\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30301,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1303\/revisions\/30301"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1199"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1303"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1303"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1303"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtei.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1303"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}